Software Architektur im Stream

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) is on the verge of fundamentally changing software architecture. In this talk, we will take a “look into the crystal ball” to explore what impact these technologies will have on traditional architectural decisions, code lifecycle and human-machine interaction. We will explore how the use of LLMs could lead to traditional architectural issues such as choice of programming language becoming less important, while new challenges arise in the areas of security and ethical responsibility. We will also discuss the potential benefits of more automated and optimized development practices enabled by these technologies. This talk is aimed at software architects, developers and technology enthusiasts who want to understand how GenAI and LLMs will shape the future architecture of our software landscapes. Together we will take an informed look at the future of software development and discuss how we as professionals can prepare for it. This recording from the Software Architecture Gathering 2025 was powered by iSAQB e.V. in collaboration with Software-Architektur im Stream. Many thanks to Kameramensch-Filmproduktion https://kameramensch.de/: Johannes Klemt, Nico Schallat, Vladimir Traut for providing the footage. Event tech by Team Kingsize https://www.team-kingsize.de/ Follow iSAQB: Instagram https://www.instagram.com/isaqb.official/ LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/isaqb.org/ Mastodon https://mastodon.social/@isaqb BlueSky https://isaqb.bsky.social Facebook https://facebook.isaqb.org

At the recent Software Architecture Gathering, Eberhard gave a talk on models, modularization, and Bounded Contexts, while Alistair explored similar themes in conversations with attendees. In this episode, the two come together to discuss the key concepts behind these topics, compare their perspectives, and answer questions from the audience. Quote from Parnas Here is the quote from Parnas’ paper that Alistair referred to: “We propose instead that one begins with a list of difficult design decisions or design decisions which are likely to change. Each module is then designed to hide such a decision from the others.” Links David Parnas: On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules Alistair Cockburn: Design in Object Technology 2: The Annotated Class of 1994 EPUB Printed Residuality Theory with Barry O’Reilly

Stimmen aus der Praxis – Live-Stream mit Erfahrungsberichten und Diskussion Wie erleben Menschen, die in der IT unterrepräsentiert sind, ihren Arbeitsalltag wirklich? In diesem Live-Stream bringen wir ungefilterte Stimmen direkt auf die Bühne der IT-Tage. Im Vorfeld haben wir persönliche Erfahrungsberichte gesammelt – von Mikroaggressionen im Team-Meeting bis zu strukturellen Hürden beim Karrierestart. Diese anonymisierten Geschichten lesen wir vor und diskutieren gemeinsam: Was läuft schief? Was funktioniert bereits gut? Und vor allem: Was kannst Du selbst, Dein Team oder Deine Organisation morgen konkret anders machen? Aus der Praxis für die Praxis: Diese Session richtet sich an alle, die Diversität nicht nur als HR-Thema verstehen, sondern als strategischen Erfolgsfaktor für ihre IT-Organisation. Ob CTO, Teamlead oder Entwickler:in – hier erhältst Du ungefilterte Einblicke aus dem Projektalltag, die sonst oft unsichtbar bleiben, und kannst konkrete Impulse direkt in Deinen Alltag mitnehmen. Was Du mitnimmst: Echte Erfahrungen statt Theorie, Verständnis für Barrieren im IT-Alltag und Handlungsfelder für inklusive Teams – so konkret wie möglich, so anonym wie nötig. Mit Liam Bergh, Sabine Wojcieszak und Eberhard Wolff

In this engaging live fishbowl session from the Software Architecture Gathering, Vaughn Vernon, Cheryl Hung, Avraham Poupko, Eberhard Wolff, and Ralf D. Müller tackle one of the most pressing questions in the field: Is software architecture about human intelligence or artificial intelligence? As AI tools increasingly design systems, analyze code, and critique architectural decisions, the panel debates whether these technologies augment or replace the architect’s role. They explore the nuanced balance between machine-generated patterns and human creativity, the ethical and accountability challenges of AI-driven architecture, and practical ways architects can thrive in an AI-augmented future. Audience participation ensures a lively, thought-provoking dialogue on the evolving craft of software architecture. Livestream production by ‪Kameramensch-Filmproduktion‬: Johannes Klemt, Nico Schallat, Vladimir Traut Event tech by Team Kingsize Follow iSAQB: Instagram LinkedIn Mastodon BlueSky Facebook