For Agility's Sake

Hear from Chris Mastnak, "Global Practice Lead - Agile Testing" at Nagarro, on what it means for QA/Testing team members to work in an agile environment.  According to Chris, life in QA gets easier with agile. He tells a story of major User Acceptance Test events at the end of a large 9-12 month build carrying a significant amount of risk. It's simply too wide of an area to cover with testing after nearly a year of development. Thanks to agile, QA can be much more confident with testing because they're covering smaller batches of functionality. Unfortunately, just like in a traditional, waterfall project, the greatest risks are pushed to the end of the timeline. This same cycle shows up sprint by sprint, with QA getting 1 day to test all of the stories of the sprint. The good news? On agile teams, this kind of an issue resolves itself after a couple of retrospectives.  As your team gets better at delivering features more frequently, you're going to need to get better at regression testing (making sure everything that worked before is not broken by new features/code). Before you were doing this a few times a year, but now you're doing it every 2 weeks. Agile teams remedy this issue by automating everything they possibly can. According to Chris, manual testing is still very important, but automation has to become a priority across teams. Chris suggests starting with automation for regression testing and sticking to manual for exploratory testing to make sure the new features are behaving as expected. What about teams that "don’t have time" to automate? Chris suggests looking for automation tools and frameworks that fit your team's situation. Aim to automate one story in each sprint, this will slowly build your automation repo.  According to Chris, an interesting side effect of agile is that it creates a cross-over between Developers and Testers. On the one hand, Testers get more involved with the development and start to understand why a feature was developed the way it was, giving them a better understanding of the behavior they should expect from it. On the other hand, Developers get more involved in the testing and start to become better at spotting gaps in test scenarios or plans. Ultimately, the team's ability to build and test a quality solution significantly improves as they work together more and more.  What does this mean for a QA Manager? There's nothing in the Agile Manifesto about the role, nor is there anything in the Scrum Framework for QA Manager, so what do you do now?  Aside from becoming a QA Coach and working to make your team of Testers the best they can possibly be, Chris suggests elevating your perspective.  Start looking across development teams and consider how to elevate transparency of testing beyond one team (it's easy for one team, but how is it done across multiple dev teams?) Start advocating for automation beyond one single team to drive quality on a larger scale.  Start anticipating what this years' big programs mean for QA.  Start thinking about and advocating for what Continuous Integration or Continuous Deployment will require across development teams.  Things you may have already been doing, but will help clear the path for your teams:  Make sure your QA environments are well cared for  Make sure your team is continuously honing its skills  Make sure your team has the necessary tools to do a stellar job  Still not satisfied? Chris points out that anyone at your company with a few years of Testing experience has likely accumulated a vast amount of knowledge about how your product works; which makes them a potential Product Owner.