I read Genesis 1 literally, but not word for word - A Conversation with Prof. Dr. John Walton (Wheaton College)

Part 2 of our mini-series:  Today, Prof.
Dr. John Walton - one of the world’s leading Old Testament
scholars -addresses a crucial question: What if the biblical
creation account was never meant as a scientific explanation, but
as something entirely different? Walton shows why taking the
Bible seriously means reading it correctly — not literally, but
in the sense intende by its original authors.

An episode for everyone who believes, doubts, or simply wants to
know whether the creation account truly conflicts with
science.

Keywords: Genesis, creation, primeval history,
Adam and Eve, Garden of Eden, tree of knowledge, the fall,
archetype, order, chaos, functional ontology, biblical
anthropology, cultural river, biblical authority, hermeneutics,
exegesis, contextualization, image of God, image of humanity,
authorial intent, Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, temple motif,
divine rest, seventh day, house and home metaphor, divine order,
Holy Scripture, doctrine of Scripture, theological methodology,
consequence vs. punishment, original sin, theodicy, serpent,
chaos creature, protoevangelium, moral order, human
responsibility, autonomy, order-bearer, participation, covenant,
Abraham, Israel, priesthood, sacred space, theology of creation,
textual fidelity, reader perspective, reader context, Bible and
science, faith reflection, spiritual transformation, biblical
metaphor, narrative theology, anthropological reading, Prof. Dr.
John H. Walton, Wheaton College, United States, ancient
worldview, Mesopotamia, Ancient Near East, philosophy, tradition,
systematic theology, enlightenment, new creation, hope, human
history, self-understanding, search for truth