Donna Adelson Trial — Georgia Cappleman’s Blistering Cross of Defense Legal Expert on “Contentious” Divorce

Donna Adelson Trial — Georgia Cappleman’s Blistering Cross of
Defense Legal Expert on “Contentious” Divorce


 This raw courtroom clip captures Assistant State Attorney
Georgia Cappleman going toe-to-toe with defense family-law expert
Linda Bailey over one deceptively simple question: Was the Wendi
Adelson–Dan Markel divorce “contentious” or just another typical
case in the trenches of family court? Bailey, called by the
defense to cool the temperature, testified that the divorce
looked much more amicable than many she’s seen and that nothing
in Donna Adelson’s involvement struck her as unusual. Cappleman
then launched into a pointed, methodical cross—pressing Bailey on
whether “contentiousness” can look very different to lawyers than
it does to the actual people living it, and whether high-stakes
motions (like the so-called “grandmother motion”) might land as a
five-alarm fire to a layperson even if an attorney views it as
routine.
You’ll hear the prosecution challenge the expert’s framing,
arguing that in the real world—outside the safe confines of legal
jargon—custody, relocation, and grandparent access can feel like
the “most important thing in the whole wide world.” Bailey holds
the line, reaffirming her view that the divorce was fundamentally
typical and that the grandmother-related filing wasn’t likely to
succeed or restrict Donna’s unsupervised time. The exchange
matters because the state’s motive theory leans on a heated
backdrop: long-running conflict, relocation battles, and a family
culture of control. If jurors accept Bailey’s narrative, the
defense gains leverage to argue the divorce itself was not a
powder keg. If they embrace Cappleman’s, the emotional stakes
around Markel’s parenting and Wendi’s move remain powerful
context for what happened next.
This segment also unfolds amid a procedural wrinkle: outside the
jury’s presence, the court addressed concerns that Bailey had
watched prior testimony (a no-no under the witness rule). Judge
Stephen Everett ultimately allowed her to testify, and the jury
returned to hear Cappleman’s cross in full. That backdrop adds a
layer of credibility chess to what you’re watching: the
prosecution probing not just what the expert believes, but how
she arrived there and whether that lens truly matches the lived
experience of the people at the center of this case.
For trial-trackers focused on motive, credibility, and juror
perception, this is one to study—tight questions, firm answers,
and the kind of back-and-forth that can tilt how a jury reads
every email, motion, and text that comes next. (Donna Adelson is
charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation,
and has pleaded not guilty.)
#hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #GeorgiaCappleman
#LindaBailey #TrueCrime #CustodyBattle #LegalAnalysis #Courtroom
#TrialUpdate #Tallahassee

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a
video?
Check out our YouTube Channel.
https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872