Why They Prosecuted the Wrong Men — Inside the Yogurt Shop Confession Fiasco

Why They Prosecuted the Wrong Men — Inside the Yogurt Shop
Confession Fiasco

In this segment, we tear open the wounds of the original
investigation. Two men—Robert Springsteen and
Michael Scott—were convicted decades ago based
almost entirely on confessions that they later recanted. DNA
would later exclude them entirely.
What pushed investigators to pursue confessions so hard?
Tunnel vision, coercive interview
tactics, and information “leaks” that allowed suspects
to parrot back nonpublic details. Over 50 people confessed at one
point or another to this crime—many obviously false.We dig into
how interview design (false‑evidence ploys, minimization, sleep
deprivation) creates a dangerous illusion of certainty. Legally,
these strategies drive miscarriages of justice. Psychologically,
they turn confessions into weapons rather than tools of
truth.
In this part you’ll learn:





Why confessions, especially in homicide, are dangerously
persuasive



How contamination and leading questions distort memory




What happens when investigators stop listening for
disconfirmation






After you hear the mistakes, you’ll see how fragile the case was
from the start—and why we can’t treat confession = guilt as an
assumption ever again.


#FalseConfession #WrongfulConviction #YogurtShopCase
#InterrogationTactics #TunnelVision #CriminalJusticeReform
#AustinMurders #InvestigativeFailures #CriminalPsychology
#InnocenceProject #YogurtShopMurders

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a
video?
Check out our YouTube Channel.
https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872