The Hidden Cost of Skipping DevOps in Power Apps

Ever launched a Power App that worked perfectly—until you tried
to update it across environments? If you’ve ever crossed your
fingers while hitting that publish button, you’re not alone. In
this podcast, we’ll unravel why skipping DevOps in your Power
Platform projects isn’t just risky—it can quietly drain time,
budget, and trust from your entire business.Stick around to see
why packaging Power Apps with proper ALM practices could be the
single biggest upgrade to your workflow you didn’t know you
needed.


When 'Publish' Means 'Panic': The Hidden Chaos of Manual Power
App Deployments


If you’ve ever seen a Power App that ran smoothly in testing but
mysteriously tripped over itself the second it hit production,
you know how fast things can fall apart. It’s easy to trust the
big purple “Publish” button. After all, it looks so
official—click it, move on, and assume everything made its way
safely from your sandbox right into someone’s workflow. But as
plenty of teams have learned, “Publish” isn’t a safety net; it’s
often a tightrope walk—no harness and plenty of wind.Picture
this: One minute, your finance team’s custom app is tracking
expenses with no complaints. People are even starting to say,
“Hey, this is way better than that old spreadsheet.” Then, Friday
afternoon rolls around. A last-minute tweak—maybe a formula
update or a new field—gets pushed out. Nobody expects anything to
crash. Still, by Monday morning, nothing’s posting the way it
should. Managers can’t approve expenses. People are sending
screenshots, emails are flying, and the phone is lighting up.
That one rushed update pushed through with “Publish” has
snowballed into a production outage. Now, instead of a quick fix,
you’re stuck tracing what broke—often without any
breadcrumbs.This is what happens when everything rides on manual
deployments. You test, you change, you hope for the best. Maybe
you open two browser tabs—one for dev, one for prod—flip back and
forth, and check that settings look the same. But the reality of
manual deployment is that it often brings a false sense of
control. If you’ve ever told yourself “It worked in my
environment; it’ll be fine in theirs,” you’ve felt that optimism.
Problem is, it’s seldom earned.I’ve watched a supply chain team
lose an entire morning to a Power App glitch triggered by a
manual deployment. Their workflow, fine in test, hit a connector
bug as soon as real-world data flowed in. No warning, no error
message—just processes silently breaking in the background. IT’s
first instinct was to try “undo.” In Power Platform, though,
that’s rarely an option. There’s no magic rollback button for a
bad Power App publish. At best, you might have a prior export
somewhere—or at worst, nothing but screenshotted settings and
memory. You patch and scramble, hoping the fix doesn’t spark new
fires. Some users stop trusting the tool. Others start keeping
their own shadow logs “just in case.” Lost confidence isn’t
easily restored.It’s tempting to see Application Lifecycle
Management—ALM—as a luxury reserved for huge organizations with
armies of DevOps engineers. But here’s where Power Platform
throws a curveball. Even the simplest Power Apps—those two-person
HR forms or team schedulers—can become mission-critical
overnight. Once other departments stack business rules and
connectors on top, stability goes from “nice to have” to
non-negotiable. ALM isn’t extra weight. It’s the structural steel
that keeps your app standing when the first big storm rolls
through.And the numbers back this up. Microsoft’s own reliability
team notes that most downtime in business apps isn’t triggered by
bugs in the code. It comes from process errors during
deployment—manual steps missed, configuration mismatches, or
incomplete solutions accidentally overwriting working components.
One ISV reported that manual Power App changes introduced nearly
triple the error rate compared to automated deployments. And
those extra errors? They multiply when teams try to push fixes
directly to prod, especially under time pressure.What doesn’t
show up in a dashboard is the real price paid for these misfires:
hours sunk into incident calls, investigation, and rework. Trust
shrinks every time a user needs to double-check the app’s
results. People build workarounds or reintroduce those infamous
“track it in Excel” side channels. Eventually, shadow IT grows up
right next to the official solution, and technical debt climbs in
the background—quietly, but relentlessly.Drilling down, you’ll
find that technical debt isn’t some abstract bogeyman. It’s the
sum of shortcuts, forgotten hotfixes, and undocumented changes
that pile up each time a manual deployment doesn’t go smoothly.
That debt slows everything down: onboarding, change requests,
even troubleshooting glitches nobody remembers introducing.
Meanwhile, updates become riskier and the urge to “never touch
what works” turns small Power Apps into fragile, frozen
relics.Most Power Platform outages can’t be blamed on faulty code
or some “unlucky day.” Instead, it’s the repeated gamble of
manual, untracked publishing—patching and hoping things hold
together. Teams let bad habits linger because, for a while, it
seems like the app is keeping pace. The real risk becomes clear
only in a crisis, when the “Publish” you trusted leaves you with
no way back and a lot of explaining to do.So, if we know manual
deployment leaves too much to chance, what does a deployment
process actually look like when you want your Power Apps to stand
up to real-world stress—without crossing your fingers every time
you hit publish?


Solution Files vs. Real ALM: Why Your Power App Isn’t as Safe as
You Think


Ever exported a Power Platform solution file, patted yourself on
the back, and thought, “now we’re safe”—only to discover that
your safety net is a lot more like a fishing net? That’s one of
those illusions nearly every team faces sooner or later. The
solution file workflow feels simple: test in dev, export the
solution, import it somewhere new, and get back to building
features. On paper, it’s the classic case of “good enough” ALM
for Power Apps. And as long as the stars align and no one on the
team made parallel changes, the process kind of works—until it
doesn’t.Here’s the catch. Relying on basic solution exports and
imports leaves you with blind spots everywhere. You don’t get
reliable versioning, so if someone asks what changed between
releases, your answer is a best guess—or worse, radio silence.
Try merging two slightly different versions manually and it
becomes an afternoon of sorting through exported files line by
line, hoping you don’t lose work or accidentally overwrite
someone else’s connector. That’s assuming you even know which
files changed. Most teams end up swapping updated ZIPs through
Teams, email, or that one shared folder that’s labeled
“final_final_really”. Even a small misstep—a connector with the
same name, a missing environment variable, a dependency that
shifts behind the scenes—can set off a chain reaction you won’t
see coming until you hit import and suddenly, something vital
stops working.I’ve watched a team learn this lesson the hard way.
They built a sales dashboard in Power Apps, mapped out a solution
containing everything—the app, flows, and connectors. Seemed
solid. But when they went to update their production environment,
the import quietly replaced the existing custom connector with a
slightly older version. There wasn’t a warning, just a silent
swap. By Monday morning, several automations failed. Leads sat
stuck in Approval instead of moving along the process. The fix
involved hours of troubleshooting before anyone realized a
“routine” import had quietly overwritten a component that was
updated elsewhere. Behind every import like that, there’s a
story—broken automations, overwritten connectors, hours lost
piecing things back together and retracing what went wrong.The
root problem comes down to the difference between moving files
around and having true Application Lifecycle Management. With
just solution files, you’re managing snapshots, not real history.
There’s no audit trail, so it’s almost impossible to trace which
changes broke something in production. If two developers make
tweaks at once, merging gets messy, fast. Suddenly, you’re not
debugging Power Apps—you’re debugging exports, sitting in
meetings trying to remember who changed what last Thursday. Full
ALM looks different. Here, every piece of the solution—code,
connections, flows—lives in proper source control. Each version
gets tracked, so you know exactly when something changed and why.
Automated build pipelines run tests on changes as they’re checked
in, catching bugs before anyone can hit publish. The old
“import-export-and-hope” workflow becomes a repeatable, reliable
process that doesn’t require you to remember every tiny detail or
trust in luck. Real ALM tools let you rewind changes, so a bad
update is just a rollback away, not a hunt for lost ZIPs.Think of
it like this: tossing your most important files in a shared
folder and calling it “backup” doesn’t protect you when things go
sideways. A proper backup tracks changes, stores history, and
lets you restore exactly what you need, when you need it. That
same logic applies to Power Apps. Solution files alone give you a
false sense of safety—until a single mistake throws the whole app
off balance.There’s plenty of research backing this up. Industry
studies regularly point out that skipping version control and
automation quickly multiplies the rate of deployment failures.
According to Microsoft’s Power Platform ALM guidance,
environments without source control see almost double the rate of
rework and post-release firefighting. These aren’t just numbers;
they line up directly with what teams experience on the
ground—endless email chains, confusion over which version is
live, and mounting technical debt that makes each change riskier
than the last.Versioning isn’t about being overly cautious. It
lets you move forward confidently, knowing you can always review
what changed, when, and why. As Power Apps grow from simple forms
to business-critical platforms, the costs of “guess and check”
multiply. One change, if untracked, can impact ten other pieces
without warning. But with source control and automated packaging,
it’s clear what moved, who moved it, and how to undo a bad step
without scrambling on a Monday morning.And here’s the real point:
if you can’t see what changed, you can’t manage risk. You can’t
fix what breaks, at least not without spending hours retracing
steps and second-guessing your last deployment. Relying on
solution file exports alone is like running without a
seatbelt—fine until it isn’t, and by then, you’re already dealing
with the fallout.So how do teams move past patchwork exports and
start managing their Power Platform changes with real intention?
What does a system built for safe, rapid change actually look
like for Power Apps at scale?


Building for Change: The Real Blueprint of Sustainable Power
Platform DevOps


Imagine if every time you tweaked your Power App—adjusting a
formula, updating a screen, rolling out a new feature—it could
evolve safely without the anxious wait of “what did we just
break?” That’s the goal most teams want but few actually reach,
especially as Power Apps grow from those quick departmental
helpers into full-blown, business-critical platforms.Most Power
Apps start out simple. Someone from HR builds a quick form for
tracking training, or a sales manager cobbles together a
dashboard in a weekend. Suddenly, people outside the original
team start relying on it. New requirements pile on. Requests come
in for approval workflows, integration with Outlook, or maybe an
automated report for leadership. The more this happens, the more
fragile the app becomes—not because it wasn’t built well at
first, but because the foundation can’t keep up with everything
now leaning on it.And here’s the real pinch: every new feature
gets pushed fast, because the business expects velocity. Users
say, “Can we just have this by next week?” so you race to add
buttons and tweak flows. Testing never seems to keep up. Release
notes, if they exist, turn into afterthoughts. The system
works—until the day it doesn’t, and you’re left trying to figure
out which last-minute feature caused the latest outage.It’s easy
to treat Power Apps as a finished product, like a static
spreadsheet or a PDF. But in reality, these apps are living
systems. They’re constantly moving—updated, extended, repurposed.
Treating them as one-offs is what gets teams in trouble. Each
change might seem tiny at the time, but over weeks and months,
those quick fixes stack up. Eventually, just touching the app
feels risky.The mature way to handle this is to see Power Apps
for what they are: evolving digital assets. If you look at the
way successful teams manage their Power Platform projects,
there’s a visible pattern. First, everything lands in source
control. Not just the “code” part of an app, but components,
connectors, flows, and environment variables. Instead of handing
around zip files and hoping nobody overwrites the wrong version,
every change gets recorded. If something goes sideways, it's
obvious what changed and who did it.Next up, build pipelines come
into play. Each time someone checks in a change, that trigger
isn’t just about moving files. Automated pipelines validate
connections, check dependencies, and can even run automated tests
to make sure that an innocent-looking tweak doesn’t break a
downstream workflow. If a change fails at this stage, the team
knows right away—well before it hits production and surprises a
hundred users.Automated testing is another layer too few teams
use, but it’s a major difference-maker. Automated tests in a
Power Platform context can look like mock user flows, verifying
that a button really triggers the right process all the way
through approvals, or checking that updated connectors pull the
data they should. This isn’t the old “just make sure the screen
opens” type of testing; it’s about making sure business logic
still stands up, even as the app grows legs and walks into new
departments.I saw a finance company handle this with a budgeting
app that started in one division and gradually rolled out across
six departments. Instead of chaos, their adoption was boring—in
the best way. Software deployments scheduled in advance, each
environment progressing from dev to test to production. Teams
filed requests, got features on the roadmap, and saw updates
every two weeks. When a critical integration pattern changed, the
automated tests failed in the pipeline—not live. The team
reverted, fixed the bug, and only then pushed the update. Users
barely noticed. The project never got a late-night call or a
panicked “undo the deployment” scramble.Release management is the
last big piece. Successful teams treat every push to production
like it matters, because it always does. They use managed
solutions, avoid direct edits in production, and lean on
approvals and playbooks that are agreed to in advance. Instead of
rushing fixes, deployments are scheduled and coordinated, so one
risky change doesn’t snowball across environments.Environment
strategy is a non-negotiable. Microsoft’s own Power Platform
documentation calls the dev-test-prod model “essential” for
separating development from live business data and users. Each
environment protects the one above it, so an experiment in dev
never becomes a fire in prod. This is the backbone of every sound
ALM practice—one that makes every update less a leap and more a
careful step forward.The payoff? Teams with these building blocks
move faster, not slower. New features ship regularly, and updates
don’t spark anxiety. People trust the process, and the business
can say yes to more requests without worrying about the whole
stack tumbling down. But as with any strong system, the devil’s
in the details. Setting this up isn’t magic—mistakes still
happen, but they’re contained early and fixed quickly.It all
raises a practical question: if this blueprint is so effective,
why do so many teams struggle to get it right? There are five
traps most Power Platform teams walk into—sometimes without even
noticing. Let’s break down what they are, and more importantly,
how to spot them before they cost you hours, data, and peace of
mind.


The Five ALM Traps: How to Break the Cycle Before It Breaks You


If ALM is so important, why do even the best Power Platform teams
keep bumping into the same problems? Most teams don’t set out to
ignore best practices. It just happens—usually one shortcut at a
time, often under the pressure of a looming deadline or an
impatient business stakeholder who’s tired of waiting. Before you
know it, the process is riddled with tiny cracks no one noticed
until something slips through.Let’s call out the five traps that
trip up even seasoned Power Apps builders. The first one is
skipping source control entirely. You wouldn’t build a web app or
manage code outside of Git or another version control system, but
Power Platform tricks people into thinking they’re the exception.
Maybe someone means to set it up later. But later rarely comes,
and before you know it, every change is an overwrite with no
history. Real teams have been caught in this when a developer
fixed what looked like a typo in a formula, only to realize days
later that someone else had already patched the calculation with
a different logic—now lost with the latest upload. The absence of
source control means you can’t compare, track, or roll back. It’s
not just risky; it guarantees you’ll lose time unraveling what
actually changed.Number two is flying blind without an
environmental strategy. Far too many Power Apps run with a single
environment, or sometimes two—dev and prod, with no real buffer
zone. What happens when someone “tests” a major update directly
in production because they don’t want to wait for a test
deployment? I saw a transportation company use prod as both their
testing and their live environment. A connector update during a
mid-morning lull seemed harmless—until bookings ground to a halt
because the new connector wasn’t ready for prime time. The
support team woke up to a mess, and nobody could remember which
settings changed. Having even a basic dev-test-prod flow would
have flagged the issue privately, instead of in front of
customers.The third pitfall is manual deployments. We’ve all
heard, or maybe even said, “it’s faster if I just do it by hand
right now.” Problem is, that habit sticks. It morphs from a
one-off into the unofficial standard. Take the HR team who copied
solution files from one environment to another to speed things
along. A missed dependency led to a feature silently failing.
Employees uploaded vacation requests, only to find out approvals
weren’t actually routed. That Monday morning scramble to “just
import the missing dependency” cost hours and introduced even
more risk as people tried to patch things while users were
already in the system. Manual deployment always looks easy the
first time. Over time, it turns predictable updates into a
guessing game.Trap number four is thinking you’ll never need a
real rollback plan—until suddenly you do. Teams often treat
rollback like an afterthought. As long as the update worked in
test, why worry? But the first time a live update causes a
breaking change, nobody can find a previous version that works.
One retail client learned this lesson when a workflow tweak wiped
out all their current orders. Their last “backup” was from a
solution export three weeks old—missing recent changes, missing
context, missing everything needed to get them back on track.
Waiting for recovery felt endless, and in the meantime, support
staff had to reassure angry users and enter orders by hand. Real
rollback isn’t a bonus feature; it’s a core requirement.The last
trap is poor documentation. Nobody loves writing docs, but the
lack of clear notes—what changed, why, and who signed off—leads
to constant confusion. When issues hit, people look through
emails or ping team members who have already moved on to other
projects. I watched a finance team spend half a day trying to
reverse-engineer why an old connector wasn’t pulling updated
records. It turned out, the data source had switched two weeks
before, and the change was never written down—just shared in a
Teams chat that quickly disappeared. With no single source of
truth, the only certainty is wasted time.These traps don’t always
announce themselves loudly. Sometimes, it’s a last-minute hotfix
rushed straight to production “just once,” or a workaround that
everyone promises to replace when there’s more time. The
unofficial “just trust me” deployment is another red flag.
Microsoft’s experts remind us that the best way to avoid trouble
is to “document all deployment steps and automate what you
can”—not because it’s fun, but because it shrinks your margin for
error.A quick self-check: Can you name the last three changes in
your app? Do you know when your solution was last deployed and by
whom? Is there a way to restore the app to a working state
without guesswork? If any answer is “not sure,” that’s where to
start looking for gaps. Even automating a single import, or
requiring a changelog, dents the risks faster than most
realize.Here’s the good news: most ALM gaps aren’t technical.
They’re process habits, built up by teams who are just trying to
keep pace. Changing even one sloppy deployment routine—or forcing
a few notes on what changed—pays off almost right away. Small
steps compound, and before long, the fire drills fade into the
background.There’s a reason all this matters. It’s not just for
the architects or the IT admins—it’s about protecting the time
and trust your entire team relies on to get real work done. What
happens next, and how you tighten up those habits, is where
business risk finally starts to shrink.


Conclusion


If you skip DevOps in Power Apps, you’re not just risking
downtime or losing track of changes—it’s business risk, plain and
simple. Every rushed deployment leaves room for lost trust and
wasted hours. ALM isn’t an add-on. It lets you scale without
driving your team into the ground. You don’t need a big-bang
setup. Try one thing: schedule a deployment, log your edits, or
spin up a test environment. Over time, the stress drops, the
reliability climbs, and updates go from nerve-wracking to normal.
Your future self—and everyone who depends on your app—will notice
the difference.


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe