Stop Blind External Sharing—Catch It Before Disaster

You’ve spent months building a secure M365 environment, but one
click can open the door to your entire document library.
Frustrated by blind spots in SharePoint and OneDrive
sharing?We’ll walk through a practical framework—policies,
scripts, alerts—that lets you finally see and control what’s
leaving your tenant, even at massive scale.


Why Your Audit Settings Might Be Lying to You


If you’ve ever opened your audit logs and felt a quiet sense of
relief, thinking everything is covered—there’s a good chance
you’re missing some of the biggest gaps. Most admins tick the
auditing box in the compliance center and assume job done. They
set the policy, see “audit log search enabled,” and move on. But
Microsoft 365, especially SharePoint and OneDrive, hides a lot of
nuance under those options. The default settings feel
comprehensive, but the cracks show up at the worst possible
times—like months into a sharing fiasco, when everyone is digging
through logs and realizing half the story isn’t even there.Let’s
take one scenario that comes up more often than we’d like.
Imagine your finance team needs to work with an external
consultant on a set of sensitive budgets. The SharePoint site
owner shares a folder, makes it easy for the consultant with a
guest link, and gets back to business as usual. Fast forward a
few months—the consultant’s project finishes, and suddenly
there’s an audit. The finance lead wants to know exactly what got
shared, when, and with whom. You open the audit logs and…find
nothing useful. No entries tracking when that folder link was
created, no logs showing access or downloads. The environment
looked secure, but the actual audit trail? Like Swiss cheese,
more holes than data.Here’s the part that catches people out:
Microsoft’s default audit policies are optimized for performance,
not completeness. The documentation buries this point, but if you
go digging through recent admin guides, you’ll notice that
standard audit logs can miss entire categories of sharing
actions. This is especially true for anonymous or guest access
links. Any auditor who’s been burned by missing entries—like for
“SharePoint external sharing invitation created” or “OneDrive
anonymous link used”—knows the pain of scrambling to rebuild what
happened after the fact.We’ve worked with organizations where the
official stance was, “We’re secure, we have auditing.” Then,
during a compliance review—maybe after a legal hold was
triggered—someone tries to track back an external share. Instead
of clear logs, they find entire gaps. During a recent legal
review for a healthcare org, legal counsel pulled up the audit
log to find out who accessed protected health info via a guest
link. The entries stopped right before things really went off the
rails. The project had to pause, teams went scrambling, and,
worst of all, no one could say for sure what left the building
and what stayed internal. It’s exactly this kind of uncertainty
that puts compliance projects at risk and sends everyone into
damage control mode.If you want a visual, picture two screens
side by side. On the left: an environment running Microsoft’s
out-of-the-box audit policies. The list of sharing events looks
reassuring at first—until you notice the missing records for
guest link creation, file previewing by external users, or cases
where links were forwarded inside a thread. On the right: the
same site, but audit logs are configured with advanced
settings—catching not only who shared what but exactly how those
links behaved after the fact. External accesses show up with
timestamps, the types of links are noted, and even which files
were accessed through a chain of guest forwards. You don’t just
have a log—you have a map of what really happened.So why does
this keep happening? For most environments, three audit policy
settings don’t get touched during rollout. First, you need to
explicitly enable enhanced auditing for SharePoint and OneDrive,
which often means using PowerShell to set policy at the
organization level. Without it, “sharing events” covers just a
narrow slice of what’s actually going out. Second, make sure to
capture “anonymous link usage,” not just link creation. Sharing
to someone outside the org—and then having those links get
broadly distributed among personal accounts—creates a gap if
usage isn’t logged. Finally, increase your log retention window.
The 90-day default might sound generous, but with guest projects
or legal investigations, you’ll want a much longer trail. The
difference between having six months of forensics and three
months can be the difference between answering a regulator’s
question or drawing a blank.Here’s where things get real: even
the best reporting scripts or fancy dashboards mean nothing if
the raw log data isn’t there to begin with. Too many teams race
ahead into automation or SIEM integrations, only to hit a wall
when the base audit configuration is half-baked. If your
compliance officer or legal team is expecting clarity and the
logs can only tell a fragment of the story, you’re not just at
risk—you’re flying blind.So, what do you actually need to flip
for full visibility? Enable advanced auditing for SharePoint and
OneDrive at the tenant level, make sure you’re logging every kind
of external link and internal sharing event, and bump your
retention out as far as compliance allows. It’s not about getting
more data for the sake of it—it’s about having a record of every
action that matters before a rogue file share lands in the wrong
inbox. Now, with your audit logs finally collecting the right
events, the floodgates open. That’s where the real challenge
kicks in: how do you cut through the noise and find the risky
activity that actually deserves your attention?


Turning Audit Noise into Action: PowerShell Done Right


If you’ve ever tried to make sense of a SharePoint or OneDrive
audit log, you already know the feeling: the data just keeps
piling up. It’s not just overwhelming. It’s relentless.
Yesterday’s export was long enough; today, it’s grown by another
few thousand rows. You scroll through page after page, but
instead of finding a crisp timeline of risky events, you’re
buried in a spreadsheet that reads like a court transcript of
every click in your environment. Getting the logs isn’t the hard
part anymore—anyone with proper permissions can run a command and
spit out every sharing event that’s happened across the tenant.
The real challenge? Knowing what even matters in the first
place.Now, exporting this data is almost a rite of passage for
Microsoft 365 admins. Fire up PowerShell, connect to Security
& Compliance, and maybe you aim for a week’s worth of data
just to keep things manageable. But then you hit that “Export
Results” button and end up with ten, maybe twenty thousand lines
in a CSV. What are you supposed to do with a mountain of
information like that? Sift through one row at a time,
cross-check email addresses, and hope something catches your eye?
That’s not monitoring. It’s digital archaeology.The reality is,
most PowerShell reporting scripts you’ll find out there scrape
everything with broad queries—Get-AdminAuditLogConfig,
Search-UnifiedAuditLog, Export-MailboxAuditLog—the list goes on.
You get a master list of events, but nearly every script throws
it into a file as-is. These exports aren’t smart. You have the
“Who,” the “What,” maybe the “When.” But try figuring out which
events point to risky behavior—users sharing intellectual
property, HR files landing in the wrong inbox, or a guest link
sneaking out to someone’s personal Gmail. Instead, you’re left
with endless logs of who opened a file, who updated a document,
and scattered references to sharing invitations, with no context
about what’s sensitive or who’s truly an outsider.Let’s drop into
a real scenario. Picture an admin—let’s call them Sam—tasked with
reviewing external sharing throughout the month. Sam dutifully
pulls down the logs every Friday, only to see spreadsheets
stretch into the tens of thousands. One tab shows hundreds of
“SharingCreated” and “SharingSet” events. There’s a list of
usernames, a hundred different document titles, and a blur of
timestamps. But at no point do these logs scream “Red Alert.”
Sam’s supposed to find patterns, but the patterns are hidden by
noise. For every actual risk—a confidential team plan sent
outside the company—there are a thousand routine shares between
project teams or calendar invites. Sam starts flagging by gut
feeling, but it’s guesswork.Here’s where that old saying rings
true: context is everything. Knowing that someone shared
“Budget-2024.xlsx” is mildly interesting; knowing that it was
sent to “outlookuser@gmail.com” instead of a partner domain is a
headline. This is the critical difference between the raw audit
logs and truly actionable intelligence. It isn’t just about
tracking “who shared what”—that’s the easy part. The real insight
comes from answering, “Was that document actually sensitive? Was
it shared with someone extern to the business? Did it involve a
OneDrive link that’s been opened by a personal email, or did it
target a known business partner?” If your reporting script can’t
answer all that, you’re still stuck in the fog.This is the point
where most people realize: the tools you find online aren’t
enough. Let’s play out a comparison. On one side, you’ve got the
generic script—Export-UnifiedAuditLog, default columns, no
filtering. You end up with a firehose of data, every event
labeled “SharingInitiated” or “AnonymousLinkCreated” but with
zero prioritization. On the other side, imagine a targeted
PowerShell report that does some real lifting: it checks the
target email address, flags domains outside your company, and
pulls in file sensitivity labels. Suddenly, your report
highlights suspicious shares—“HR-Benefits.pdf” sent to a Gmail
address shows up red; project plans shared with partners stay
green. The data tells a story.Plenty of organizations have seen
this play out, especially as remote work ramps up. One healthcare
group started sending a weekly external sharing digest to
security. It looked fine for months—until one week there was a
noticeable spike in “@hotmail.com” and “@gmail.com” recipients.
That prompted an audit right away. And sure enough, a recently
departed employee had shared a bundle of documents to their own
personal inbox. If they’d just used raw logs, that spike would’ve
gone unnoticed in spreadsheet purgatory. By pulling out who,
what, and especially “to whom,” the team was able to act
fast—before anything sensitive got out for good.Of course,
capturing the right slice of data isn’t a one-time fix. Patterns
shift over time. Maybe last month’s reports missed a brand new
category of sensitive files. Or a PowerShell filter didn’t catch
a new domain for a project vendor. Once you’ve filtered the noise
and surfaced meaningful events, you’re halfway there. But risks
don’t play by your reporting schedule.So here’s what actually
works: when you build out your script, pull exactly what you
need. Specify the sharing event types you care about, add logic
to check for non-corporate domains, and loop in document
sensitivity. Run searches for “SharingSet” and
“AnonymousLinkUsed,” pipe the output into a custom filter, and
deliver a report that doesn’t just bury you in hundreds of
“success” entries. You want the handful of “need to call someone
now” alerts. Suddenly, your audit logs stop being just
busywork—they’re the warning system you actually need. Still,
even a perfect PowerShell report only helps after the fact. What
about catching dangerous sharing as it happens, instead of days
or weeks later?


Real-Time Risk Detection: Alerts that Actually Work


If you’ve ever set up alerts for external sharing in SharePoint
or OneDrive, you probably remember that mild sense of
accomplishment—right up until your inbox lit up like a slot
machine. It sounds good on paper: “Alert me whenever a document
is shared externally.” And then you realize, almost instantly,
that it’s completely unsustainable. It’s that classic dilemma: if
every incident is important, pretty soon, nothing feels urgent.
You’re wading through dozens, even hundreds, of auto-generated
notifications, and after week two they’re effectively wallpaper.
You create rules just to move them out of your main inbox, making
the entire system meaningless. On the flip side, if you dial back
the alerts too far, suddenly the biggest risk slips right through
the cracks—no alert, no warning, nothing to see until the damage
is already done.Setting up alert policies in M365 is technically
simple. The wizard walks you through the steps, asks which
activities to monitor, and you just check the boxes. That part’s
not the problem. The disconnect starts when we try to make those
alerts useful, not just noisy. The default options look tempting:
“notify for every sharing action,” or “send an email when
external access is granted.” But these broad triggers almost
guarantee alert fatigue, and that’s the fastest way to have your
security team tune out the real threats. Think about a real-life
case. An organization configures an alert to fire for every
document that’s shared outside the company. First morning, a
hundred pings. By the end of the week, no one’s reading them.
They’re stored, technically, but there’s zero context around
what’s truly risky—so a confidential finance file and a team
lunch invitation get treated exactly the same. The irony is,
overalerting can become just as dangerous as underalerting,
because eyes glaze over at the first “FYI” and it all blurs into
background noise.So how do you move beyond the spam? The trick is
to ditch the “catch everything” mentality and get sharp about
what behaviors actually matter. Not every external share deserves
the red alert treatment. What you want are signals—not
noise—especially those that point to compliance hazards. Sharing
to a personal Gmail or a non-corporate domain? Sensitive document
showing up at an unfamiliar destination? A guest user who’s never
been in your system suddenly accessing six confidential sites in
an hour? These are all classic examples where your team should
hit the brakes and investigate immediately.To get there, start by
identifying which sharing activities really do need focus. Look
at what’s actually happened in your environment—have there been
cases where HR files, financial data, or intellectual property
ended up outside authorized partners? Is it personal emails
accepting guest links? Or is someone sending documents to
unapproved cloud storage accounts? Use these past incidents as a
reference point, and create your rules around them—not around
every possible event. Ask yourself, which file types, naming
conventions, or user groups should light up your dashboard? If
every marketing update triggers a warning, something’s
miscalibrated.Let’s break down the mechanics. Instead of a
single, broad alert, you configure layered criteria. In M365, you
can set up alert policies that combine access conditions, file
sensitivity labels, and external domain patterns. For example,
instead of alerting every time a document goes out, send a
real-time notification only when a document tagged as
“confidential” is shared with an external guest, or when the
recipient’s email matches patterns like “gmail.com” or
“yahoo.com.” Visualize this: not a barrage of single-trigger
pings, but a flow of targeted alerts that escalate based on
pre-defined rules. The alert creation interface lets you stack
conditions—document sensitivity, file location, user group, and
destination email. It’s granular, and it works.Let’s make it
concrete. A team shares out routine sales flyers—those pass
quietly, as they should. Suddenly, an HR file labeled
“salary-planning” gets flagged because it’s gone out to an
unknown user at a non-corporate address. That singular event
triggers a clear, actionable alert—not fifty routine reports.
Security sees the notification, verifies the recipient is outside
the allowed domain list, and revokes access within minutes. This
is exactly where targeted alerts pay off: less noise, more
action, and faster remediation. But here’s what still trips
people up—even good alerts are only as strong as the patterns
they’re built to spot. If your rules aren’t evolving, you’re back
to square one with blind spots. The best teams routinely review
their incident data, update alert thresholds, and cross-reference
with new types of risk as user behavior changes. Maybe a new
business unit is spinning up sites and sharing externally in ways
you hadn’t planned for. Or Microsoft changes how link sharing
works and suddenly your old rules don’t catch everything. The
system has to adapt, or your alerts get stale fast.The payoff
here is a set of real-time alerts that surface the true risks in
your SharePoint and OneDrive deployment—without drowning you in
background chatter. The right policies not only call out the big
events, but make acting on them fast and repeatable. Of course,
as usage grows and your environment gets more complex, those
alerts need to scale too. What started as a simple setup for a
handful of departments soon needs to support a company ten times
the size, with entirely new compliance commitments.


Scaling and Sustaining Your Monitoring System


If you’ve ever felt good about a monitoring setup for 50 users,
you know the sense of order that comes with it—until the user
count jumps to 5,000 and things fall apart. That tiny, manageable
system that let you review every alert by hand quickly turns into
an avalanche. It’s one of the most common traps: designing
controls around the current state and forgetting that
environments don’t stand still. New hires, new teams, and another
round of department-led site creation can upend everything you
thought was nailed down. If you’re lucky, you catch it early, but
more often than not, it’s the Monday morning call from compliance
or security that forces a scramble.A monitoring system in
Microsoft 365 isn’t a box you tick during a big migration and
then leave in the corner. The tools, the reports, and the
underlying logic all need to track the evolving shape of your
business. It’s easy to get lulled into a false sense of
confidence when things are calm, but the second Site Provisioning
goes self-service or a department starts spinning up OneDrives
for every project, you find out just how brittle your setup
really is. It honestly feels like SharePoint and OneDrive are
chasing shadows—spend all your time tweaking for today’s risks,
and tomorrow, someone launches a new set of sites without telling
IT.Consider what happens during a merger or acquisition.
Suddenly, the number of SharePoint sites doubles. Old PowerShell
scripts that were scheduled to poll “all sites created as of last
quarter” start missing half of what just spun up. These new
collections don’t inherit your existing audit settings by
default. Your regular reports come in on Monday, but half the new
guest links and sharing events have fallen through the cracks. By
the time you notice, guest access might have been running for
weeks with little real auditing or alerting. The reality is, any
major change—be it more users, a new region lighting up the
tenant, or compliance rules tightening up—can break the best laid
monitoring plans overnight. It helps to get granular about how
SharePoint and OneDrive behave as your usage scales. SharePoint
is collaborative by nature—sites, libraries, and shared
workspaces scale out as teams and departments grow. OneDrive, on
the other hand, is deeply personal and becomes harder to control
the more individuals are encouraged to share files directly.
SharePoint sites tend to have more structured permission models
with group-based access, making monitoring slightly more
predictable. But with OneDrive, individual users can create
hundreds of sharing links—some internal, some external—making
traditional scripts sluggish at best and blind at worst. The
script that worked fine for “every SharePoint site with more than
10 members” becomes a bottleneck when fifteen new teams pop up
overnight. If you’re running a weekly report that used to take
two minutes and now takes 45, your system is telling you it’s
time to adapt.Now, think about what a sustainable, scalable
monitoring system actually looks like. Imagine a diagram laid out
on the whiteboard: at the base, core PowerShell scripts collect
audit logs from both SharePoint and OneDrive. Layered above that
are automation functions—maybe run in Azure Automation or with
Logic Apps—triggering regular exports without manual
intervention. Next comes your filtering system: scripts or
services examining every sharing event, sorting out the “normal”
from the “potentially risky.” Alert rules sit on top, running in
real time as new sites, documents, or users appear. Finally, an
admin dashboard catches every flagged alert, rolling up high-risk
events from hundreds of sources into a view that doesn’t leave
you playing catch-up. The strength of this approach is that
you’re not dependent on a single log, script, or alert—each layer
supports the others, catching changes that would otherwise slip
through.Plenty of global companies have had to make this shift.
One high-growth tech firm found that their manual reporting setup
couldn’t keep pace with the quarterly headcount spike. They built
a system where, as soon as a new business unit spun up sites,
Azure Automation would detect it, apply the organization’s
advanced audit settings via PowerShell, schedule regular report
generation, and funnel alerts to the right ops teams. That same
process managed to flag a surge in external sharing after an
acquisition before it became a headline issue. No more hoping
someone would manually spot the problem in an ocean of log
entries. The takeaway? Let automation cover what people can’t
possibly track on their own.Microsoft makes a habit of changing
settings, introducing new sharing mechanisms, and moving the
goalposts with compliance requirements. If your environment is
still depending on scripts written years ago or auditing that’s
manually applied to a list of “known” sites, you’re inviting risk
every time something new launches. Future-proofing comes down to
three habits: first, automate onboarding for every new SharePoint
site and OneDrive so your audit settings and alerting rules
follow users, not the other way around. Second, review and update
your scripts regularly—track Microsoft’s roadmap, watch for
changes in the audit log schema, and test filters for new sharing
features as they’re released. Finally, use dynamic reporting:
instead of hardcoding a list of sites, pull real-time lists every
time a report runs. Your controls should learn as your
environment changes, not force you into months of manual catch-up
whenever a merger or new business launches.The difference between
a monitoring setup that fails at scale and one that evolves is
this: automation doesn’t just buy time, it’s what makes true
coverage possible. Keeping audit and alert systems fresh is a
constant process, but it means your team doesn’t have to rely on
luck or after-the-fact reviews to stay safe. And as your company
grows, merges, or pivots, sustainable systems let you focus less
on fire drills and more on proactive risk detection. With all of
that humming along in the background, you end up freeing your
best people to actually analyze the context of alerts, not just
chase missing data. That’s how you build monitoring that flexes
with your business, no matter how quickly it changes. And once
you’ve got the foundation working, the way you think about risk
and controls will start to shift. Instead of treating compliance
as a series of reactions, you get ahead—and that’s the mindset
that stops blind spots before they ever become a headline.


Conclusion


If you can actually see your external sharing, you can control
it—blind spots are what cause trouble and make compliance
incidents so messy. Every environment has at least one area that
goes unnoticed. Think for a second: where is that in your tenant?
Maybe it’s a legacy site, a OneDrive someone forgot about, or a
set of guest links never reviewed. The reality is, Microsoft
gives you the tools and controls, but it’s your processes and
monitoring system that turn those features into something
bulletproof. So, what will you do to find that blind spot before
it creates your next headache?


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe