Using Dynamics 365 Finance Data in Fabric for Financial Forecasting

Ever wonder why your rolling forecast in D365 F&O never
matches reality? If your finance data lives in silos and your
dashboards pull from five different places, you're not alone.
Let’s break down exactly how Microsoft Fabric unifies those
scattered modules—GL, sub-ledgers, budgets—so your next forecast
finally lines up with what really happens.


Stay tuned to see how connecting the dots reveals insights you’ve
been missing and makes variance reports practically build
themselves.


Why Your D365 F&O Data Feels Disjointed—And Why That Matters


If you’ve ever tried to explain a variance report from D365
F&O, you know that uneasy silence when you realize the
numbers you’re quoting all trace back to a different source file.
One line item was a last-minute export from the general ledger;
another came from a sub-ledger dump downloaded three days
earlier; and the budget numbers? Those lived in a spreadsheet
that’s bounced between three inboxes since Monday. There’s that
moment you say, “Let me get back to you on that,” and hope you
can make all these numbers add up by tomorrow’s meeting. This is
the story for most finance teams living with Dynamics 365 Finance
& Operations day after day. The tools promise a single ERP,
but the reality is more like a collection of narrow silos that
only truly fit together in PowerPoint.


Let’s talk about why these islands exist. In D365 F&O, the
general ledger keeps a record of every journal entry—your overall
financial story, but only at the highest level. Sub-ledgers log
all the gritty transaction details—accounts payable, fixed
assets, purchasing, sales. Good luck getting your GL trial
balance to match the line-by-line details from the AP or AR
sub-ledgers, especially if those modules close on separate
schedules. Budgets, meanwhile, live in their own world, often
managed as static files and uploaded just once each year. The
system pulls reports from all these places, but each module uses
different codes for cost centers, departments, or projects. Chart
of accounts structures evolve, but not every module gets the same
memo. A cost center code in the general ledger might not even
exist in your asset register if someone forgot to update both
places. In the end, we’re all running back and forth, trying to
square off details from three different islands that insist on
speaking their own dialects.


This patchwork creates a reporting nightmare. One month’s close
cycle stretches out because the AP sub-ledger needs time to
reconcile manual adjustments, and the general ledger team is
still chasing missing postings. The budgets submitted by
department heads last quarter now need “just a small tweak”
before they match reality, which means firing up another round of
copy-paste marathons in Excel. If you’re explaining variance
numbers to your CFO, every slight mismatch raises eyebrows—“Why
does actuals versus budget have a $22,000 gap here?”—even though
you know that most of those gaps come from timing delays between
modules, not true business performance. The pressure mounts when
audit season rolls around and no one can agree which table is the
actual source of truth. There’s nothing quite like realizing the
numbers you signed off on came from last week’s backup, not the
current system.


Outside the office, research confirms what you already feel.
Gartner recently pointed out that organizations with fragmented
financial data spend up to 50% more time on routine reporting
than peers with unified data. That’s not an accounting quirk;
it’s a direct cost in lost productivity. While D365 F&O’s
sales pitch promises full integration, what you usually get is a
set of modules engineered separately and merged along the way
with a lot of manual patchwork. APIs exist, sure, but getting
every piece to talk flawlessly—without middleware breaking after
each update—requires more patience than most IT budgets allow.
That’s why most of us quietly rely on exported spreadsheets and
the legendary index-match formula to chase down the truth.


It’s not just theoretical. Picture this: it’s 10:37 p.m. You’re
hunched over your laptop, juggling the latest GL download and a
subtotal pasted from last month’s fixed asset summary. You notice
the numbers don’t quite line up—a $4,760 difference that
shouldn’t be there. So, you scroll through the AP ledger,
wondering who posted that late invoice adjustment. Somewhere in
that sea of decimals, reality got a little fuzzier. Maybe your
budget owner will spot it, maybe not—but you know it’s one more
Achilles heel in the forecast you’re expected to explain
tomorrow.


Teams run into these disconnects every month. Reporting cycles
slow down. Forecasting accuracy drifts. Worst case,
decision-makers miss a trend because half the data was stale by
the time the variance report landed on their desk. Nobody enjoys
living in the world of after-hours Excel edits, hiding cell
formulas, and triple-checking pivot tables for errors that
shouldn’t even exist. It’s like modern ERP software dressed up
with retro manual processes under the hood.


Now, if you’re wondering why D365 F&O can’t unify everything
out of the box: you’re not alone. Integration feels logical in
demos, but real business data is messy. Chart of account codes
change mid-year, departments get renamed, and project IDs don’t
sync between modules unless you script specialized connectors.
Most teams settle for “close enough” and hope the next release
will really, finally, bring the dream of seamless reporting.


But what if you could actually see the whole picture, without
living in Excel or hiring a small army to clean up last-mile
exports? Here’s the reality: before you can forecast anything
with confidence, you need to understand exactly how these modules
interact—or don’t. That clarity is the first step to reports and
predictions that real humans can trust. So, the obvious question:
if the modules resist natively working together, can you make
them collaborate somewhere else—maybe in Fabric? Let’s look at
how these systems can finally start talking the same language,
and what it really takes to pull together a unified pipeline.


Connecting the Dots: Building a Unified Data Pipeline with Fabric


Most finance teams have given up looking for a magic “sync all”
button in D365 F&O. If you've ever seen your GL, AP, and
project records living in their own corners, you're probably
wondering if there’s any hope of turning that chaos into
something actionable. That’s where Microsoft Fabric draws
attention. It’s built for exactly this kind of problem—connecting
raw data across business modules, pulling it into a single,
unified model, and making reporting refresh itself instead of you
racing toward another reporting deadline.


Now, skepticism here is totally reasonable. Everyone’s crossed
their fingers and started a “pilot” data integration project,
only for it to get abandoned once someone discovers three
critical reports rely on an old export workflow. No one wants to
break what mostly works, even if it means dealing with endless
copy-paste sessions. The beauty of Fabric is that it doesn’t
force a rip-and-replace approach. Instead, it sets up
connections—think of it as Stackable pipes—pulling only what you
need from each module, on a schedule you decide, and feeding it
into a workspace designed for analytics and forecasting.


Let’s talk through the nuts and bolts of what extracting D365
F&O data actually means, because this step shapes everything
after it. If you’re looking to build rolling forecasts, variance
reports, or Power BI dashboards, three main groups of data matter
most: the General Ledger (GL) journals, sub-ledger transactions
(so, AP, AR, fixed assets), and your approved budgets or
forecasts. In D365 F&O, you’ll usually be working with tables
like LedgerJournalTrans for transactional GL detail,
LedgerEntryJournal for your high-level GL movement, VendTrans and
CustTrans for vendor and customer line items, and AssetTrans for
tracking changes to fixed assets. Budget tables—often
BudgetRegisterEntry—typically hold your planned figures, but they
require careful mapping because budgeting structure can shift
more than you’d expect. Pulling all this in isolation gives you
fragments, but when combined through a proper pipeline, it’s the
backbone of actually seeing where the money’s going.


Setting up an actual, automated pipeline isn’t just picking a
data connector and hoping it’ll run every night. Fabric offers
first-party connectors directly into D365 F&O, supporting
direct connections over OData or via Synapse Link for even larger
datasets, without the file download bottleneck. The process
usually starts in Fabric Dataflows, where you authenticate with
an organizational account that has table-level read permissions
in D365. You then define each dataflow—pulling in the GL details,
AP transactions, budgets—setting up schedules that match your
reporting cadence. Data privacy is non-negotiable: you’ll want
least-privilege access on every connection and API key, with
Azure Active Directory handling most of the grunt work around
authorization.


When you get to modeling, here’s where things come alive. Imagine
pulling a complete chart of accounts out of D365, flattened and
mapped to the rest of your organization’s dimensions—departments,
business units, maybe even products. You’ll likely export a
DimMainAccount table, but it doesn’t end there. Dimensions like
business unit or project usually live in their own tables (think
DimensionAttributeValueSet), so you need to join them, sometimes
many-to-many, into one readable structure. The practical upshot:
if your CFO wants to drill from a rolled-up P&L straight down
to a particular project’s cost overrun, they can do it without
asking you for “just one more export.”


It isn’t all roses at the transformation stage. Every team
eventually hits the “why doesn’t this account exist in both
places?” wall. You might find missing dimensions in sub-ledger
entries, because a business unit field was left blank in AP but
required in GL. Account codes drift, especially after
reorganizations. And budgets from different departments—don’t be
surprised if one uses “BU-01” while the other spells out
“BusinessUnit01.” Out-of-sync period definitions mean your
January actuals don’t line up with the January budget, which
triggers endless back-and-forth.


This is where transformation and cleansing are more than
technical chores. You’ll need to standardize codes, sometimes
building translation tables during ETL to bridge old and new
naming conventions. Missing data calls for set rules—should a
blank cost center get tagged as “Unassigned,” or should the
record be flagged for review before it hits your forecasts?
Dataflows in Fabric support these checks, letting you script out
logic for translation, imputation, and validation as part of the
pipeline. No step is too mundane: I’ve seen more reports derailed
by a lazy trailing space in an account code than by any formula
error.


Once this pipeline is running smoothly, you’ll notice a
fundamental shift. Data lands in a single lake—deduplicated,
standardized, and up-to-date. Instead of pulling five different
reports before every forecast meeting, you access a unified
dataset that actually reflects what’s in D365 as of this morning.
The reporting cycle contracts, and so does the margin for error.
What used to take hours of massaging spreadsheets becomes
refresh-and-go. Power BI dashboards built on this foundation
don’t just visualize—they drill all the way back to the raw
transaction if you need answers. The upshot? Analytics finally
keeps up with the pace of the business, not the other way around.


All that said, unlocking clean, unified data is just the prelude.
Once things are flowing reliably, you can finally stop worrying
about feeding the pipeline and start building the forecast models
everyone’s been asking for. But how does all this new data power
a model that doesn’t break under real-world change? Let’s get
into building rolling forecasts that adapt as quickly as your
business does.


Forecasting That Actually Reflects Reality: From Data to Dynamic
Models


If you’ve ever felt that sinking feeling when a single late
transaction sends your entire forecast sideways, you’re in good
company. There’s that odd frustration of finally wrestling a
forecast into place, double-checking every cell, only to have
real-world numbers come in and punch a hole straight through it.
Spreadsheets that made sense two days ago suddenly go out of
date, and the models you so carefully set up just can’t keep up.
That’s not a spreadsheet problem—it’s a data problem. The real
issue is your source of truth isn’t unified, so your rolling
forecast is only as good as the last time you did a manual
refresh.


Let’s focus on how having unified, real-time data turns that
whole scenario on its head. As soon as you centralize D365
F&O details inside Fabric, you stop building forecasts on gut
feel or stale data and start working from the actual,
up-to-the-minute numbers. Every new journal entry, every
sub-ledger transaction, every late budget tweak—it all feeds in
directly, no more waiting until month-end or exporting for the
hundredth time. When that unified dataset sits in Fabric, you
gain the ability to run rolling forecasts that react to your
business as quickly as it actually moves. That means your
forecast isn’t an annual ritual or a quarterly headache—it's just
part of day-to-day operations. You’re no longer patching together
yesterday’s best guess. You’re asking, “What’s coming next?” and
actually getting an answer you can trust.


If you’ve only ever used traditional forecasting tools, you
probably know the pain points. Manual updates take hours,
sometimes days. Each time you adjust resource plans or revenue
projections, you hope you caught all the links—because one broken
formula means hunting through dozens of sheets to see where
things fell apart. Spreadsheets might have built-in functions,
but they’re static snapshots. Even if you pull new data, it’s
never quite in sync with what D365 F&O is showing you right
now. The result? Leadership questions every output; teams hedge
their numbers “just in case”; and variance reports end up patched
together with explanations that only sort of make sense.


With Fabric, unified data unlocks a completely different toolkit
for forecasting. You’re not limited to last period’s totals or
basic trend lines. You can actually apply statistical methods at
scale because your data foundation is consistent. Moving averages
become meaningful when they update live with every fresh batch of
transactions. Simple regressions let you identify how changes in
one area—say, headcount or supply costs—drive shifts in margin or
budget performance across the organization. Want to see how a
change in customer payment behavior impacts quarterly cash flow?
Plug it into a scenario model and see the outcome ripple through
your entire rolling forecast, without starting from scratch.


Here’s the step-by-step reality: Once your data pipeline into
Fabric is humming, you start by connecting your actuals—GL
transactions, sub-ledgers, budgets—to an analytics workspace.
There, you can build a rolling forecast model in just a few
clicks. Set rules for how each piece of incoming data should
update your projections. New AP invoices post? Actual spend rolls
forward. Budget modifications come in? Forecasted totals adjust
instantly. The model doesn’t have to sit idle or break—it absorbs
every change and recalibrates automatically. You move from
babysitting spreadsheets to managing a system that actually
self-corrects.


Variance reporting is where you really see value. In the old
world, variance reports meant a careful dance between exported
D365 numbers and whatever the last saved forecast file had in it.
Misalignments—sometimes down to the decimal—would mean disastrous
back-and-forth before every major review. With Fabric unified
forecasting, you’re comparing apples to apples. The same set of
actuals transforms to feed both sides: your projections and your
variance reports. Each time numbers update in D365, your
dashboards auto-refresh, so those meetings that used to spiral
into “whose number is right?” become practical discussions about
the actual drivers of business change.


That’s also where Power BI dashboards step in. Instead of static
tables, you’re looking at trends over time, breakdowns by
department, and even instant flags for outliers—maybe a sudden
spike in fixed asset spend or an unexpected drop in sales
receipts. Power BI can draw directly from the Fabric model, so
everyone—from analysts to execs—gets visuals that make sense and
drill-down paths that never end with a “data not available”
warning. These dashboards aren’t just prettier; they’re
actionable. Spotting issues or opportunities is about three
clicks away, not a marathon of Excel detective work.


It’s not just theory. Take a services firm that unified its D365
F&O and used Fabric-based rolling forecasts to catch a bad
debt surge early. By comparing forecasted receipts to
rapidly-changing actuals, their finance lead noticed receivables
lengthening almost in real time. Instead of learning about the
trend months later, they flagged it mid-quarter and worked with
account managers to intervene. That’s the shift: forecasting as a
living, breathing process, not a retrospective post-mortem.


When rolling forecasts and variance reports keep pace with your
real-world changes, finance finally gets back to steering the
business instead of running after it. But what about trust? When
so much rides on automated data flow, how do you know it all
stacks up? That’s where keeping your forecasts reliable and
secure becomes just as important as building them.


Data Integrity and Governance: Keeping Your Forecasts Trustworthy


If you ever sat in a review meeting trying to defend a forecast,
only to realize you can’t explain why the numbers look the way
they do, you know how quickly trust dissolves. All the clean
Power BI visuals in the world don’t matter if no one can answer
the simple question, “Where did this number come from?” With D365
F&O and Fabric in the mix, you gain massive forecasting
power, but the messy side effect is that responsibility for data
doesn’t just double—it multiplies. Any time you move and
transform sensitive financial data across systems, you open up
cracks for mistakes to sneak in. Accidental changes, mismatched
dimensions, and good old-fashioned old exports sitting quietly in
a folder until someone pastes in obsolete figures—these are the
real-world threats to your forecast’s credibility.


Let’s talk about why data integrity is more than a checkbox. In
any D365 F&O to Fabric pipeline, the very flexibility that
makes analytics possible is also what introduces risk. Someone
updates a cost center mapping in the GL, but forgets to revisit
old sub-ledger config. Department codes drift as teams re-org,
but there’s no process to update historical budget records to
match. Maybe a dataflow fails and last week’s incomplete export
sneaks into the pipeline, giving you a variance report that’s
both technically correct and completely misleading. Even one of
these small slips can snowball, triggering hours of fire drills
or, worse, leadership calling into question the whole process the
next time numbers don’t add up.


The first line of defense is making sure every number in your
forecast can be traced—back through all its transformations—to
the original entry in D365 F&O. Fabric helps by tracking data
lineage automatically. That means, for every dataset, you can see
where it started, every transformation it passed through, and
what schedule or user triggered the update. If someone asks, “Why
is R&D showing a spike this quarter?” it takes two clicks to
see not just the transaction detail, but exactly how that entry
moved from invoice to report. This isn’t optional—it’s the only
way to be confident your automation is working for you, not
against you.


Access management steps in as another critical guardrail. Fabric
lets you build fine-grained access controls at every stage of the
pipeline. You decide who can see raw D365 F&O records, who
can touch transformed and modeled datasets, and who can actually
publish or update Power BI dashboards. Financial data is
sensitive by nature; you don’t want an intern with the ability to
overwrite all your Q1 actuals, or have a third-party report
builder poking around in payroll tables. Permissions tie in with
Azure Active Directory, using security groups and role
assignments, so access isn’t managed with emails and
spreadsheets—it’s integrated into your everyday identity
management.


Audit logs are your receipt trail. Every significant
action—import, transformation, even visualization refresh—gets
logged and timestamped. That means after a questionable forecast
or a sudden swing in reported results, you don’t have to play
detective. You just pull up the logs and see exactly who made
what change, when, and (thanks to data lineage) what downstream
effect it had. It’s not glamorous work, but ask anyone who’s been
through an audit: when numbers are on the line, proof is
priceless.


Security isn't just about locking things down, either. Fabric
brings built-in encryption—both at-rest and in-transit—so
sensitive data doesn’t travel unprotected. If you’re storing bank
details, payroll, or supplier invoices, data stays encrypted
whether it’s sitting in a warehouse or flowing through a report.
Add in continuous monitoring, and you’ve got alerts for unusual
behavior—like someone trying to extract unusually large numbers
of records or attempts to access restricted tables. These aren’t
just features you turn on; they’re part of maintaining trust with
finance, audit, and compliance teams alike.


You see the value of this the moment something goes wrong.
Picture an analyst importing an old backup file into the budget
table, not realizing it’s a year out of date. Without a data
lineage view, you might never catch the mistake—until forecasted
spend looks bizarre and the finance chief demands answers. In a
pipeline with proper controls, you spot the anomaly within
minutes: wrong file, wrong timestamp, flagged in a validation
check. Disaster averted before it makes it to the board deck.


Documentation is the glue holding all this together. If process
steps live only in someone’s head—or a dusty SharePoint
folder—turnover or absence means you risk losing critical
context. Fabric’s dataflows support inline documentation, and you
can plug workflow steps directly into Power Platform’s automation
tools. That means, even as processes change, you’re not left
guessing how yesterday’s data got here or what logic drives each
step.


Ongoing data quality checks round out the picture. Set up
validation rules that scan for out-of-range values, missing cost
center codes, or transactions posting to unexpected periods.
Build alerts so issues get flagged before they skew a forecast.
No matter how tight your schedule, these small automations add up
to a system that’s always watching—even when you’re not.


Confidence in your forecasts comes from knowing more than just
the “what”—you have proof of the “how” and “why.” Every figure
can be traced, every change can be explained, and your system
stands up when questions get tough. That’s how data integrity
transforms forecasting from a race against the spreadsheet clock
into a business asset that evolves as fast as you do. And with
each layer in place, you start to see how a truly adaptive
financial forecasting system isn’t just possible—it’s within
reach as your organization grows.


Conclusion


Most teams think unified data will solve everything, but the real
change happens when your forecasts update as soon as your
business does—no more chasing old spreadsheets or cross-checking
exports. If you want to see actual results, it’s time to build
systems that move at the speed of your operations. The tools are
here, built on Microsoft 365 and Power Platform, and they’re
designed for finance teams who need more than static snapshots on
a slide. If seeing your complete financial picture—clean,
current, and reliable—sounds better than late-night Excel fixes,
you know what to do next.


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe