Using Copilot in Microsoft Fabric to Build Data Models

Ever wondered why your data models feel clunky, even with the
best intentions? You’re not alone. Today, I’m showing where
Copilot actually accelerates your Microsoft Fabric workflow—and
where it still needs a human touch. We’ll identify the pressure
points in data pipelines, highlight real Copilot use cases, and
answer: can an AI assistant really turn your raw data into better
insights, faster? Stick around—because the answers might
completely shift your approach to data modeling.


From Data Dump to Smart Input: Where Copilot Starts Working


If you’ve ever uploaded a spreadsheet to Microsoft Fabric and
instantly regretted it, you’re not alone. A lot of us assume that
cleaning up data comes after the fact—that a little patience,
some brute force, and a round or two with Excel formulas can fix
the mess. But here’s something that catches a lot of people off
guard: Copilot doesn’t wait for you to discover you’ve made a
mess; it starts scanning your data the moment you connect it.
This isn’t just about checking for empty cells or odd dates.
Copilot actually reviews the makeup of your source, picking apart
structures, highlighting columns that don’t line up, and flagging
data types that are going to trip you up later. Most people miss
these until they’re halfway through building a pipeline that’s
already doomed. Copilot gets to it before that time sink even
begins.Say you’ve brought in a CSV export from a third-party
system. The column headers are inconsistent, some fields are
mashed together, and—worst of all—your dates are in three
different formats. Instead of simply pointing out that “something
looks off,” Copilot goes deeper. It calls out the structural
problems, zeroing in on columns that exist in the schema but
aren’t accounted for in your import, or fields with mixed data
types that Power BI will choke on down the line. What’s more,
Copilot doesn’t just shrug its virtual shoulders and leave you to
it. You’ll get actionable recommendations: rename these headers
for consistency, split out this nested column, standardize those
date formats before you import. Picture connecting to an API for
the first time—maybe a marketing tool with custom field names
like “annual_sales_usd” in one table and “salesUSD” in another.
Where most people would only realize the mismatch after failing
to join the tables, Copilot flags the mismatch up front and
suggests unified naming, backed by its understanding of data
relationships.The reality is—not every data source is on its best
behavior. Some sources are basically chaos in a spreadsheet. And
that matters, because about 60% of pipeline errors trace back to
issues you could’ve spotted at this stage. That number isn’t just
a scare tactic; it comes from internal studies that tracked the
most common pain points in failed data projects inside Fabric.
Copilot plays the messy detective for you—it doesn’t just surface
problems, it tells you why they’re a problem, and, crucially,
what to do about them before you waste days stuck in the pipeline
troubleshooting loop.A lot of tools out there will tell you
what’s wrong after you hit “run” and everything blows up. Copilot
takes a smarter approach by proposing what to do next. For
example, it’ll flag if your IDs are stored as text in one place
and numbers in another, then recommend converting them to a
common type—before you ever hit a join statement. It also nudges
you toward best practices that don’t always make the top of your
mind, like suggesting you normalize certain tables or use
specific ingestion formats that preserve column fidelity. These
are the kinds of details that usually take trial and error, or a
stack of Stack Overflow searches, to get right. Copilot
effectively short-circuits that cycle and pushes you toward
cleaner, more usable data from the start.Sometimes, the surprises
are actually helpful. It’s not just about cleaning, but
optimizing your data as it comes in. For larger datasets, Copilot
offers up partitioning strategies—maybe breaking up your sales
data by region instead of stuffing everything into one table.
This isn’t just a formatting tweak; partitioned data can speed up
model refreshes, reduce query times, and spare you a lot of
backend headaches. We’re talking tangible performance gains that
you might have completely overlooked if you’d gone the manual
route. And instead of just showing you a grid of data in preview
mode, Copilot gives you a peek into how those tweaks would impact
your future data model. You see a visual mockup of potential
relationships, cardinalities, and even a summary of predicted
data quality after changes are applied.Approaching your data
cleanup this way doesn’t just remove one headache—it changes the
downstream process. When the intake is smooth, the
transformations you apply later are faster and more effective.
Less time is spent on figuring out why a join failed or why your
Power BI visuals show “blank” everywhere. You’re not just
sidestepping bugs—you’re prepping your data for smarter, adaptive
processing in every layer that follows. Using Copilot right from
the beginning means more accurate models, fewer last-minute
surprises, and pipelines that actually make sense
end-to-end.There’s a clear payoff: dialing Copilot into your
intake stage builds a foundation for every decision you make
downstream. Instead of fixing mistakes after the fact, you see
and solve them when they matter most. And that means, when it’s
time to transform and model your data, you’re starting from a
place of strength—not a scramble to repair everything that
slipped through. Which brings us to what happens after the
intake—the messy middle. This is where Copilot moves from smart
suggestions to hands-on transformation, automatically shaping and
refining your data with the same level of insight.


Turning Data Chaos into Clarity: Copilot’s Transformation Engine


Now that your data’s coming in clean, the real grind begins. The
transformation layer is where most projects stumble—not because
the tools are lacking, but because matching business logic to a
mess of tables gets tedious fast. Think about every time you’ve
loaded data, only to spend the next hour dragging fields around,
renaming columns that make no sense, and writing formulas from
memory. We’ve all sat there with a dozen join conditions open,
second-guessing whether that “transaction_date” is actually last
purchase or just an import timestamp. And if you’ve built even a
single Power BI model, you know how a missing relationship or a
mismatched data type can ripple straight through to every report
and dashboard after.What Copilot does differently is pull you out
of that trap of endless trial and error. It watches how you’re
shaping the data—what columns you merge, which tables you join,
where you add those hard-to-document DAX calculations—and it
offers alternatives, sometimes before you’ve even realized you
need them. Imagine you’re putting together a report for the
finance team. You’ve linked transactional data with your customer
master, but the numbers still don’t add up right. Instead of
trawling through lookup tables, Copilot suggests aggregating
sales by region, not just by month, and then spits out a
ready-to-use DAX measure for year-over-year growth. You don’t
have to memorize or debug the formula. It appears as a
suggestion, complete with explanations about what’s driving the
calculation.There’s a nagging worry that Copilot might
over-simplify things, or that it’ll miss a subtle rule you’ve
ironed out with a business partner over three long meetings.
That’s a valid concern—AI isn’t a mind reader, and sometimes the
first draft suggestion is too broad, missing that, say, one
product line shouldn’t be included in a given calculation. The
longer you use Copilot, though, the tighter those recommendations
get. The system asks for feedback anytime you revise or reject
one of its suggestions, so the next time you build a similar
model, it remembers the nuance. It gradually learns what really
matters for your org versus generic assumptions. The
back-and-forth turns into a collaboration rather than a one-off
hint.Actual user data backs this up. In the last year, studies
have shown that AI-generated DAX measures in Fabric are now
matching the accuracy and performance of formulas written by
experienced BI developers, at least for standard business tasks
like running totals, percent growth, and segment filtering. Where
a new analyst might spend hours troubleshooting why a total
return measure breaks during year transitions, Copilot’s
templates for these scenarios have been tested across massive
datasets and unusual cases. That doesn’t mean every formula is
perfect, but the floor for quality has risen dramatically.Where
Copilot really sets itself apart isn’t in just automating the
basics—it spots performance issues in your steps and calls them
out. If you’re chaining together five queries when two would do,
or if your joins are out of order and dragging down refresh
times, it flags those as bottlenecks. You’ll get nudges to merge
queries or re-sequence steps for efficiency, not just
correctness. These are the little things that usually only come
up after your model hits a wall or you get calls about slow
dashboards. Copilot puts those warnings front and center, so
you’re not left guessing why your workspace crawls when the data
grows.One side of data transformation that gets overlooked is
documentation. The more hands touch a model, the more brittle and
mysterious it becomes—especially if you’re moving fast and don’t
take time to annotate steps or write up notes on why a filter
exists. Copilot steps in here, too. As you accept or customize
transformation steps, it generates a readable log of changes,
captures your reasoning behind tweaks, and stores it as metadata
inside the model. Colleagues jumping in later don’t have to
reverse-engineer the intent behind each transformation—they see
the logic and business rule in plain language.If you’ve ever had
to defend a calculated column to an auditor, you know the pain of
digging up old project notes. Copilot’s auto-documentation means
you can pull a quick explanation for any change, complete with a
version history. This isn’t just a convenience—it can shave days
off the process when your models need to be reviewed or shared
with someone new.The ultimate effect? You’re no longer bogged
down in syntax and workarounds. Instead, those hours spent
puzzling through one-off issues get redirected into refining the
model’s business value: asking sharper questions, experimenting
with segmentation approaches, or testing new KPIs. By the time
you press “publish,” the bulk of the grunt work has been handled
or at least flagged by Copilot, leaving you to focus on the
decisions that actually move the business forward.This leads
right into the piece that trips up even seasoned
analysts—visualizing the data in a way that delivers answers
instead of just adding clutter. Building out the measures and
cleaning up logic is one piece; translating those numbers into
visuals that support action is a whole different challenge.
That’s where Copilot’s next round of suggestions make a
noticeable difference.


From Numbers to Narratives: Copilot’s Visual Suggestions in Power
BI


Building out clean, logical models in Fabric gets you partway
there, but let’s be honest—most dashboards end up collecting dust
because the visuals don’t speak to what your audience actually
cares about. There’s this old habit where people just let Power
BI throw some bar charts onto a page, hoping one of them will
impress a director enough to spark a question. But when you watch
how leadership teams scroll past report tabs with deadpan
expressions, you start to see the problem. It’s not that there
isn’t data; it’s that the visuals don’t connect with the business
questions people are actually asking. That’s where Copilot steps
in, and for once, it’s not just playing catch-up. Instead of
tossing generic visuals into your report, Copilot sits on top of
your model and runs a scan. It reads not just your fields but the
relationships between them, your calculated measures, and the
layers you’ve stacked up through your pipeline. This is where
things shift. For example, say you’re assembling a sales report
for leadership. You have region, product, and profit measures,
and you know leadership doesn't want another basic line chart
that looks like every other report from the past year. Copilot
processes your structure and suggests a waterfall chart to
explain how each cost and revenue factor contributes to overall
profit, so the breakdown tells a story instead of just stacking
bars. For sales by geography, instead of another cluster of
columns, you get a recommendation for a map visual that
highlights where performance is outpacing goals, not just where
sales are highest in raw numbers.There’s always a question
here—is Copilot giving you something genuinely impactful or just
slapping a shiny skin over the same old data? What’s different is
the layer of explanation you get. When Copilot drops in a
suggested visual, it doesn’t stop at, “Here’s a waterfall chart.”
It spells out why the waterfall is effective—maybe because your
dataset shows multiple additive and subtractive values, so the
chart structure directly reflects the journey of profit rather
than hiding detail behind a summary total. For a map, Copilot can
point out that your model includes geographic fields with direct
relationships to sales metrics, making a spatial layout more
useful than a traditional table.A lot of reporting tools just let
the user guess what will look good, then leave you with a
dashboard that’s technically correct but not all that insightful.
Copilot meets you halfway, identifying which visuals match not
just the field type, but the direction of analysis. That extra
push can be the difference between a report that gets referenced
in meetings and one that’s quietly ignored. There’s research
backing this up—studies tracking Power BI user sessions show that
integrating Copilot’s visual suggestions leads to faster
completion of the report design phase, sometimes cutting time by
up to 40%. More interesting, engagement with those reports
actually goes up because end users see something tailored to
their needs instead of a wall of sameness. Reports built with
Copilot’s input also get shared more often internally, suggesting
that people trust the insights just a little more.Now, even with
all these recommendations, Copilot’s not just stacking up visuals
for the sake of variety. It does a little triage as well. Say
you’ve dropped in ten segments on a pie chart or built a table
with so many rows the numbers blur together. Copilot flags those
choices as problematic. Instead, it might prompt you to break out
a bar chart for clearer comparisons or use a decomposition tree
to drill down on an outlier that gets lost in a noisy slice of
pie. That means Copilot is protecting you from those common
pitfalls where a slick visual actually hides what matters, or
worse, leads someone to the wrong conclusion.Formatting matters a
lot more than most people think, and this is one of those areas
Copilot doesn’t overlook. Maybe your axis scaling is masking
trends, making changes look flat when, in fact, they matter to
the business. Or perhaps your color palette fails accessibility
guidelines, making it harder for some users to see differences in
data points. Copilot not only suggests formatting tweaks—like
fixing axes, adjusting data labels, or shifting to a
high-contrast palette—but also explains why those choices matter.
These nudges lead to visuals that aren’t just compliant with
standards but are actually more readable and perform better
across devices.There are stories surfacing from users who tried
out suggestions they would’ve skipped. One user, working through
a regional sales model, saw Copilot recommend a decomposition
tree instead of a flat summary. Not only did that surface a
missed anomaly—a region that looked average in the summary but
spiked in one category—it actually kicked off a project to fix a
sales allocation error that might have gone undetected for
another quarter. The takeaway is, sometimes the best visual isn’t
the obvious one. Copilot’s engine learns the relationships in
your model and the intent behind your KPIs, giving you a shot at
surfacing things you didn’t even know to look for.So, these
visual suggestions aren't just about making things prettier for a
meeting—they're about constructing views that spark conversation,
point out issues, and directly support real business decisions.
The model’s groundwork means nothing unless people actually use
your dashboards to act. As you start seeing these tailored
visuals and clearer formatting, you get more than engagement—you
get action. Next up, there’s the learning curve that doesn’t just
affect Copilot, but also you: the feedback loop that turns your
data modeling workflow into something sharper over time.


The Feedback Loop: Training Copilot—and Your Own Data IQ


Most people see Copilot as a suggestion machine. It gives you
recommendations; you either take them or you pass. But if you
scratch the surface, the relationship is a bit more
complicated—and frankly, smarter—than a one-way street. Every
single time you send feedback to Copilot, whether you’re
accepting that new DAX formula or overriding a suggested column
combination, you’re not just tuning the AI. You’re actually
rethinking your own logic with every tweak. Sort of like that
moment when you change an autopilot’s route and are forced to
double-check your map. Fabric’s Copilot isn’t writing notes on a
blank slate; it’s actively absorbing your workflow and adapting,
which ends up shifting how you approach decisions after a
while.Picture this: You’ve spent half a day shaping a pretty
standard sales model, and just as you go to accept Copilot’s
recommended “total profit” measure, it tosses in a calculation
you know doesn’t match your reporting standard. Maybe it missed
an exclusion for partner discounts, or it bundled in a promo that
should be separated out. You change the formula. Instantly,
Copilot asks for context—a short description or check mark about
the rule you applied. The key here is that input doesn’t
disappear into the abyss. The next time you build a model with
similar data, Copilot remembers: No more assuming all revenue is
actual profit, and certainly no more forgetting to leave out
partner discounts on quarterly reports. So your feedback actually
loops back into every later suggestion in a way most people
wouldn’t expect. The process isn’t just about efficiency, it’s
about accuracy, version after version.There’s a hesitation point
people have to get past. The idea that letting an AI watch and
learn from your corrections is risky makes sense. If you tell
Copilot the wrong thing, does it anchor itself to a mistake? What
if it picks up a clumsy workaround that you used just to hit a
deadline and then makes it gospel? The anxiety isn’t far-fetched.
Organizations don’t exactly want their business logic drifting
unless they can track how it changes. But here’s the thing:
Copilot’s design in Fabric means it never stops asking for input
when there’s a change or a rejection. That running commentary—the
little reasons and notes—get recorded as part of the feedback
cycle. Over time, this log helps steer its recommendations so
they land closer to your specific business rules, not just the
generic defaults. The more you interact, the more
business-specific the AI becomes. And if you need to roll back a
habit, it’s tracked and explainable. The result is an evolving
engine that grows more flexible, not more brittle.A team I worked
with started out ignoring half of Copilot’s suggestions. Their
first few models were standard-issue: basic joins, a few bland
visuals, nothing that really jumped off the page. But as they
slowly started responding—rejecting visuals, reworking DAX for
new product lines, clarifying why a certain transformation step
mattered—something shifted. Within a month, Copilot wasn’t just
suggesting less generic output; it was lining up visuals that
mirrored the company’s KPIs, and even prompting transformations
that matched new business processes they’d adopted. Their
pipeline actually sped up too, because the repeated corrections
fed Copilot information that forced it out of default mode and
into a more customized pattern. By tying feedback loops to the
real-world needs of their business, they closed the gap between
“good enough” models and results that stood up to serious
review.It’s not just anecdotes driving this point. Studies are
tracking how actively working with Copilot’s feedback cycle moves
the needle. Teams that give regular feedback—whether positive,
negative, or even just little explanatory nudges—see modeling
error rates drop. Reporting becomes more relevant, and accuracy
in calculated measures improves. The latest numbers show that
engaged teams are hitting about a 30% bump in overall reporting
accuracy and precision when compared to groups who only passively
accept or reject suggestions without adding context. The
implication here isn’t magic; it’s targeted learning through
interaction. The more Copilot sees, and the more you force it to
explain or refine, the closer your data models track with
business intent.Unexpectedly, this feedback system isn’t just
training the AI. More users are reporting that reviewing and
correcting Copilot’s output is actually tuning their own approach
to modeling. That sounds odd, but you see it in the way people
start to anticipate issues, spot hidden logic flaws, or even add
documentation where they never bothered before. Instead of just
rubber-stamping whatever comes up, teams get into the habit of
challenging recommendations, editing formulas, and thinking more
deliberately about why certain visuals work and others don’t.
It’s become common to see people pick up modeling best practices
almost by accident—habits they credit to the act of explaining
corrections or defending a data logic tweak to Copilot. This
isn’t about automating yourself out of a job; it’s about nudging
your data instincts forward, as the system matures alongside
you.So, using Copilot isn’t a passive experience—it’s a
partnership that sharpens both the tool and the user over time.
The more you invest in feedback, the tighter your models,
reports, and dashboards become. Your workflow moves from basic
acceptance to active design, and the results reflect choices
instead of defaults. If you’re strategic about it, Copilot ends
up serving not just as an efficiency booster, but as a quiet
engine for skill-building inside your team and across your
projects. Which brings us back to why Copilot shouldn’t just be
another tool you ignore—actively shaping it is what actually sets
it apart for Fabric workflows. Now, with all that in mind, you
might be wondering how to use these ideas practically to
challenge your own model-building habits.


Conclusion


If you think Copilot is just about speed, you’re missing where it
actually changes things. You’re not just automating
busywork—you’re improving the entire system. Each time you use
Copilot, your models, your reports, and even your approach to
data start shifting. It’s less about replacing decisions and more
about sharpening your instincts, one suggestion at a time. Don’t
just take Copilot’s advice—shape it with your feedback, watch how
your insights get smarter, and challenge your old routines. If
you learned something new about your workflow today, drop it in
the comments. Sometimes, the biggest change comes from that next
Copilot prompt.


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe