Building Reusable Components with Power Platform CLI (PAC CLI)

Ever wonder why your Power Platform projects spiral into chaos as
soon as more than one environment is involved? Today, we’ll
unpack how the PAC CLI could be the missing puzzle piece for
finally bringing order to your DevOps workflow. By the end,
you’ll see why managing solutions, components, and plug-ins
across environments isn’t just possible—it’s surprisingly
smooth.Can a single set of commands save you hours of rework and
headaches? Stick around and find out how the right PAC CLI
strategy flips the script on Power Platform sprawl.


Why PAC CLI Feels Different—And Actually Matters


If you’ve worked in Power Apps for more than a day and tried to
get your handiwork out of the maker portal and into another
environment, you know the feeling. The portal is quick for
prototyping—drop a button here, connect a flow there, and it all
just works. Or at least, that’s the story until you try to move
that app to a new environment. Suddenly, you’re dealing with
missing data sources. You wonder why the same thing that worked
in DEV is breaking in QA. Manual rework creeps in—renaming
components, hunting for dependencies, patching settings that
should have stayed in sync. It’s like sending a group email and
realizing half your attachments never made it. That initial sense
of “this is so easy” that you get from the point-and-click
experience fades fast the moment environments get involved.That’s
not just a minor hiccup—it’s the reality most teams hit. Citizen
developers and IT pros start off in the Power Apps portal because
it’s built to be friendly, at least on the surface. It walks you
through building screens and automating workflows. But let’s be
honest—the moment you need to maintain what you built, or God
forbid, scale it, cracks start showing. The Power Platform world
was designed to let people create without code, which is
fantastic until you realize that a real business app has to live
in more than one place, with consistent behavior every time. You
can fudge it by manually redoing work, but long-term, nobody
wants to update five versions of the same button across five
environments. That’s wasted time.The big elephant in the room is
change management. When you create components in the portal, it’s
easy to feel like everything is self-contained. But Power
Platform’s biggest strength—its flexibility—often creates
headaches when you need to move things between environments.
Suddenly, what you built isn’t as portable as you thought. Even
small differences between test and prod can turn into hours of
troubleshooting, not because you’ve done something wrong, but
because the portal simply isn’t built for true portability or
component reuse. You can get by for a while, but it’s a fragile
way to work, more like building sandcastles than real
applications.So when people see the PAC CLI for the first time,
the usual reaction is hesitation. A command-line interface, by
itself, feels like a throwback. You can almost feel the
reluctance—“Do I really want to mess with scripting when the
portal covers most of what I need?” But here’s the weird thing:
The PAC CLI isn’t just a tool for pushing buttons through a
different UI. It forces a change in mindset. Instead of thinking
in terms of building once and dragging copies everywhere, you
start to assemble solutions like a software engineer would.
Components become assets, with versions, dependencies, and proper
lifecycles. That’s the leap most folks miss. There’s a learning
curve, but it’s nothing compared to the treadmill of repeated
manual work.It’s almost funny—the CLI looks intimidating, but
after a few tries, you start to see what it actually unlocks.
Scripting your builds and deployments means you’re not stuck
clicking through the same screens over and over. You’re not
sitting there with a checklist, chewing your fingernails and
hoping you didn’t forget to attach that one key flow. Instead,
you script the process, and you know exactly what’s included
every single time. If a dependency is missing, the CLI tells you.
If you switch tenants, you’re not blind. No more wild guessing
which environment you’re in. No more opening three browser tabs
just to double-check your context. It’s like switching from
hand-writing every invoice by hand to generating them through a
billing system—tedious becomes manageable.The sharpest difference
isn’t about automation for automation’s sake. PAC CLI allows you
to manage components with practices borrowed from real software
engineering. Versioning, so you know what’s running where.
Reusability, so you’re not reinventing the wheel. And maybe most
important of all, it lets you actually troubleshoot. When things
break, you aren’t left with vague error popups; you get logs,
details, actionable steps. Teams who stick to point-and-click
workflows often find that small bugs get multiplied every time
they update a component by hand. Eventually, the app becomes
brittle. Nobody wants to fix it; everyone dreads even minor
changes. At that point, “business agility” is just marketing
speak.What’s refreshing about the CLI approach is how quickly
even basic DevOps ideas start making sense. You don’t need to be
a full-stack engineer to appreciate what happens when you can
script moving a solution from dev to test to prod. Suddenly,
things are predictable. You avoid those endless rounds of “it
works on my machine” or “wait, which version is this?” Both IT
pros and business users can benefit—especially the ones who swore
they’d never touch a terminal window. Once you get why the CLI
matters, you start seeing those repetitive portal tasks for what
they are: busywork.Still, the idea of scripts and setups can put
some folks off. It feels like a risk if your environment is
already running fine, or worse, if you’ve already bricked
something before just by trying the latest tool. But here’s the
thing: Setting up PAC CLI doesn’t mean torching your existing
workflow. If you do it right, you can set up a parallel process,
tinker, and experiment without putting your current apps in
danger. And that first CLI-powered export or deployment, where
the whole solution just works across environments, is oddly
satisfying. Once you see it, you’ll wonder why you stayed in the
portal for so long.And that sets us up for the next step—getting
PAC CLI running without breaking what’s already in place. Turns
out, avoiding the usual first-timer mistakes is easier than you’d
think, if you know what to watch for.


Setting Up for Success—Without Breaking What Works


If you’ve ever watched a developer silently stare at their screen
after a rogue CLI install wiped their environment, you know why
any new tool—especially one that runs outside a safety net—can
trigger flashbacks. There’s something unnerving about mixing
business apps with command-line utilities. You might want to get
fancy with PAC CLI, but it’s hard to ignore what’s already
running smoothly in your workspace. Nobody wants to be
responsible for breaking critical flows or side-swiping a live
Power App, especially if you’re juggling work in shared sandboxes
or, worse, production. The reality is, most teams have at least
one story where a well-meaning deployment spiraled out of control
just because someone followed a generic tutorial that left out
boring details—like authentication, dependency clashes, or how
persistent installs mess with global settings.The first hurdle
with Power Platform CLI is the install itself. Microsoft makes
the documentation approachable, but it’s easy to miss the part
about environment separation. If you launch straight into
installing on your daily driver—without thinking through profiles
or how that authentication works in real life—you’re opening the
door to headaches. Those quiet moments where you catch yourself
sweating over which tenant you’re targeting? Everyone runs into
them eventually, usually after a warning window that pops up
halfway through your first attempt at ‘pac auth create.’ The
tension comes from tutorials that gloss over the edge cases.
“Just install it globally and you’re good!” Except, for teams
running multiple client tenants or jumping between test and prod,
global installs can end up stepping on each other’s toes. It’s
more common than you think—settings and tokens lingering from
previous sessions get reused, and now you’re in a totally
different environment than you expected.This is where profiles
and smart installs come into play—features that most first-timers
overlook. PAC CLI doesn’t require you to bulldoze your existing
workflow or make sweeping changes to your working environment.
Instead, you can spin up a clean, contained setup, using
environment variables or lightweight sandbox VMs to isolate your
CLI usage. This means you’re running side-by-side with the portal
and other development tools, not replacing them. For anyone who’s
ever been burned by an installer that didn’t give you an undo
button, knowing you can play in a sandbox makes the difference
between cautious curiosity and actual adoption.Let’s walk through
how this works in practice, because this is where most teams get
stuck. Imagine you’ve just set up a new test environment. Instead
of connecting PAC CLI directly to your company’s production
tenant, you start with a sandbox. Once the CLI is up and running,
the first thing you do isn’t build anything at all—it’s
authentication. You use ‘pac auth list’ to see which environments
are already in the mix, and ‘pac auth create’ to link up with
your sandbox. With this, you can explicitly control where your
solutions and plug-ins get deployed. If something goes wrong,
worst case, you break your isolated test tenant—your production
data is safe and untouched. But here’s the trick that most folks
gloss over: Environment profiles aren’t just a “nice-to-have.”
They’re your insurance policy against those accidental, “Did I
just overwrite production?” moments. Each authentication profile
is tied to its own context, so you can jump between tenants like
you’d switch tabs in a browser. You’re not limited to a single
set of credentials or stuck wondering which environment you’re
targeting—every command you run is scoped. No more leaning over
your desk, double-checking portal URLs while silently panicking
that you’re about to mess up something critical.There’s a certain
calm that comes from verifying your pipeline before you do
anything irreversible. Once you’ve linked PAC CLI to the right
test environment, run a dry command—query the environment, list
solutions, or test a fake deployment. Most teams forget to do
this, jumping straight from install to workspace changes. But
those extra thirty seconds confirm that you’re not making any
changes outside your controlled space. And it’s not just about
safety. Knowing precisely where each action lands means you can
trace every step later if something unexpected pops up.The beauty
of this approach is how it lets you experiment with CLI-driven
development without risking the stability of your production
builds. You’re free to build, break, and rebuild with zero fear
that a missed flag or stray script will nuke your company’s
workflows. And once you’re comfortable? That’s when the CLI
starts to shine. You don’t just replicate what’s possible in the
portal; you unlock a toolkit for automating packaging, managing
dependencies, and tracking changes—a whole new level of control
over your Power Platform assets.Once you’re running in a safe,
contained sandbox, you start to see where the Command Line does
things the portal can’t. Managing environment-specific
authentication, packaging entire solutions programmatically, and
testing deployments without risking live data—all suddenly become
routine. The “CLI anxiety” melts away, replaced by the efficiency
of scripting out every dull, error-prone process you used to do
by hand. And the best part? You still have your portal experience
for ad-hoc changes and visualization. PAC CLI just becomes the
safety net underneath.But none of that matters unless you can
reliably move your work between environments. Now that the CLI is
set up without carnage, it’s time to see what actually happens
when you package your components into real, portable
solutions—and why proper packaging flips the entire workflow on
its head.


Solution Packaging: From Component Chaos to Real Portability


If you’ve ever tried to promote a Power App or a custom component
from dev to production, you’ll know the pain of watching pieces
fall apart mid-flight. Connections break. Some controls don’t
show up. Custom logic that quietly worked in the sandbox suddenly
fails in production, and you’re left digging through mismatched
solutions trying to figure out what got lost in the shuffle. This
is the scene that plays out, again and again, on teams that treat
component management as an afterthought. It’s easy to think you
can just copy a solution, push it through the portal, and move
on. But that approach is exactly where environment sprawl sneaks
in—dozens of slightly different versions floating around, manual
patch jobs, and a release process that relies more on muscle
memory than anything predictable.Let’s talk about the way most
teams approach this. They build something in dev, test half of
it, ship what seems stable to a higher environment, and hope for
the best. Troubleshooting is a constant—one person’s “fix” in QA
becomes a brand-new bug in Prod. Instead of treating solutions as
products to be packaged and maintained, they become side
projects. You might see folders full of app exports and patch
scripts nobody really trusts. It’s not just inefficient; it’s
exhausting. And for anyone who ends up owning those apps, every
update feels riskier than the last.This is where PAC CLI steps
up. At first glance, those dry-sounding commands—‘pac solution
init’, ‘pac solution add-reference’, ‘pac solution pack’—don’t
scream excitement. But under the hood, they transform how you
manage business logic across environments. Instead of pushing
random files and hoping nothing gets missed, you’re building
actual, portable software assets. When you use ‘pac solution
init’, you create a defined structure—a blueprint. With ‘pac
solution add-reference’, you tell the solution about every
dependency, plug-in, or custom connector it needs. And when you
use ‘pac solution pack’, the real power shows up: everything gets
bundled, including metadata, dependencies, and version info.Think
of this like packing for a business trip. You’re not just
stuffing clothes into a duffle. You’re systematically rolling
socks, making sure your chargers, presentations, and even your
travel adapter are accounted for. Every item has a place. You
know what’s in your bag and, maybe more important, you know
what’s missing before you walk out the door. That’s what a
managed solution does—no more hunting around for missing
dependency files after the upgrade is already halfway done. This
approach takes the surprise out of migration. You can unpack your
entire solution in a new environment, hit deploy, and watch
everything—including connections and required data—just appear,
as designed.The difference isn’t academic. Teams that move to
this style of packaging notice something else: less rework.
Instead of constantly babysitting deployments, they spend more
time actually building features. When everything lives in a
single, versioned solution, rolling back a bad deployment becomes
straightforward. If a key dependency is missing, the packing
process tells you—before you create a mess in production. This
predictability is worth its weight in gold the first time you
push a solution to UAT and everything simply works.And it goes
deeper. The lifecycle here starts with initialization—scaffolding
out your solution with ‘pac solution init’ so it’s ready to grow.
You can add references to plug-ins, flows, or even web resources
as you go, using ‘pac solution add-reference’. This isn’t just a
technical step; it’s a way to build a checklist into your
process. When it comes time to migrate, ‘pac solution pack’ wraps
everything together, listing what’s in the box and letting you
spot holes quickly. You can version each package, track what
changes, and even parallel test new features before merging them.
This is the kind of operational discipline that, until now, often
felt out of reach for Power Platform teams.One overlooked benefit
is that you start treating every piece—every app, plug-in, and
connector—as a component with a real lifecycle. No more rewriting
logic for every environment. If you need to apply a patch, you
update the solution, increment the version, and push it. No
manual copy-pasta. This prevents drift—where dev and prod slowly
become two different things, each with its own undocumented
tweaks. Over time, your platform becomes a set of reusable
modules, not a pile of half-connected scripts.There’s data to
back this up. Research and surveys point out that teams who adopt
formal solution packaging spend significantly less time
troubleshooting deployments. They move faster when building
net-new features because they aren’t cleaning up last week’s
migration mess. And that’s where you start to see the
payoff—shipping more often, with less stress and fewer late
nights spent debugging invisible issues.Once you hit that groove,
it’s hard to go back to the portal’s export-import routine. You
realize how much time you wasted on manual deployment
steps—copying, reviewing, double-checking, and hoping nothing
fell through the cracks. The CLI turns solution packaging into a
routine, testable part of your workflow. Your only regret might
be not setting it up sooner, especially as you see how reusable,
managed assets reduce those “it worked yesterday” mysteries.So,
with solution packaging now squared away, the real fun
begins—handling plug-ins and smooth, automated deployments. This
is where PAC CLI goes beyond merely moving assets; it unlocks
automation and true CI/CD that brings Power Platform in line with
serious DevOps practices.


Automation and Plug-In Deployment: The Missing Link in DevOps


You’ve packaged your solution, everything looks tidy, and you’re
ready to ship that neat bundle to a new environment. But if
you’ve worked with Power Platform for any amount of time, you
know the easy part is over. The roadblock comes when plug-ins are
involved—custom server-side logic that quietly powers your most
important business rules. A lot of folks still depend on the
maker portal’s UI to register these plug-ins. It seems manageable
while your project is small. You open the web page, upload the
DLL, fill in some basic details, and hope nothing gets lost in
translation. But that security quickly evaporates as soon as you
need to update, troubleshoot, or, even worse, roll back a change
after something goes sideways in production. Suddenly, that
comfortable point-and-click workflow falls apart. You end up
crossing your fingers, repeating steps with no guarantee that the
plug-in in production matches what’s actually running in dev—or
that anyone can even figure out which version is live.Here’s
where PAC CLI quietly rewrites the whole deployment story. The
command-line isn’t just a convenience; it’s an equalizer. With
PAC CLI, you’re no longer tied to one-off manual uploads. You can
script plug-in registration end-to-end so that the same build
steps run every single time. Picture deploying a custom plug-in
for lead assignment logic across dev, test, and prod without
redoing every field by hand. With PAC CLI, you use
straightforward commands to register, update, and even uninstall
plug-ins as part of your deployment pipeline. That shift turns
plug-in deployment from a risky chore into a repeatable,
traceable process. The real trick is that you’re able to roll
changes out, validate them in lower environments, and if
something isn’t right, run the same script to revert or patch.
It’s not glamorous work, but it’s how you stop worrying about
hidden mismatches and start building confidence with every
release.Let’s walk through a scenario most teams have faced.
Imagine you’ve finished a new plug-in—say, something that
auto-assigns cases based on scores. You link it into your managed
solution, then use PAC CLI to pack up the solution and register
the DLL. Now, you deploy to your sandbox environment. If an error
comes up during the registration, you actually get meaningful
logs. Instead of a generic “registration failed” toast that the
portal sometimes dishes out, PAC CLI gives you a full stack
trace—maybe you missed an interface, or the constructor isn’t
what’s expected. The logs are detailed and easy to parse, making
root cause analysis a matter of minutes, not hours. That’s a
shift. Instead of guessing what went wrong, you own the
deployment.The same commands that drive plug-in deployment
locally can be plugged right into Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions.
You build a pipeline where PAC CLI does the heavy lifting: it
picks up your latest plug-ins, pushes them to the right
environment, and reports back when each step finishes. It’s a
pattern that saves teams real time, not just in deployment but in
chasing down the inevitable oops-moment when a plug-in breaks
during a release. By automating these steps, you lower the risk
that someone will miss a detail at 2 a.m. or forget which DLL
made it to prod. In practice, you see fewer last-minute rescue
missions and more uneventful releases where the tech just
works.There’s another layer here that most portal-heavy workflows
don’t offer: real systems thinking. Once you’re using PAC CLI as
more than just a point tool—when it becomes part of your release
pipeline—you stop treating every deployment as a unique
snowflake. Instead, you create a pipeline that runs the same way
for every environment and every release. You test changes in
isolation, move them through quality gates, and automate
validation. This kind of discipline is where you start to see
Power Platform function like a true software ecosystem, instead
of a collection of one-off hacks that only you and your immediate
teammates understand.The traceability that comes from automation
is a big win, too. PAC CLI logs every action—what was registered,
when, and under which credentials. If you need to audit a
deployment, you have a record. If something goes wrong, you
follow the breadcrumbs instead of living with uncertainty.
Compare that to portal-based moves, where the paper trail is thin
and you’re never quite sure whether that “last saved” timestamp
tells the real story. For teams responsible for regulated
environments or large portfolios, those logs aren’t
nice-to-haves—they’re non-negotiable. Compliance, rollback, and
troubleshooting finally feel manageable instead of
intimidating.But it’s not only about big enterprises with
sprawling teams. PAC CLI doesn’t care if you’re flying solo.
Automation, scripting, and reusable pipelines level the playing
field, whether you’re the lone Power Apps champion juggling
multiple projects or supporting a global team. Even
single-developer shops get predictable deployments and fewer
fire-drills, all without investing in heavyweight infrastructure.
The basics—repeatability, traceability, and error-proof
packaging—bring value no matter your scale.Since PAC CLI bakes
these practices into day-to-day workflows, it quietly elevates
everything you do across the Power Platform stack. Applications,
components, plug-ins—each one becomes portable, auditable, and,
most importantly, not a pain to update. With automation in place,
you can focus on building, confident that your releases aren’t an
experiment every time.So once your automation game is up and
running, the final step is putting it all together—creating a
Power Platform environment that isn’t just less chaotic, but is
actually built to grow with your needs and scale when new
projects land on your desk.


Conclusion


If you look at every Power Platform success story, speed is
rarely the long-term advantage. It’s about making sure every part
of your ecosystem survives change—whether you’re responding to
new business asks or patching a bug that just popped up. PAC CLI
is quietly the difference between building quick prototypes and
architecting something that lasts. You’re not just saving time;
you’re stacking the deck in your favor so your work doesn’t fall
apart during the next migration or audit. If you actually want
more control and less firefighting, PAC CLI is where you plant
that flag. Try scripting and see.


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe