Fabric Notebooks for Data Transformation and ML

Ever wrangled data in Power BI and thought, "There has to be an
easier way to prep and model this—without a maze of clicks"?
Today, we're showing you how Fabric Notebooks let you control
every stage, from raw Lakehouse data to a clean dataset ready for
ML, all in a familiar Python or R environment. There's one trick
in Fabric that most pros overlook—and it can transform your
entire analytics workflow. Curious what it is?


Why Fabric Notebooks? Breaking the Clicks-and-Drag
Cycle


If you’ve ever found yourself clicking through one Power BI menu
after another, hoping for a miracle cleanup or that one magic
filter, you’re not alone. Most teams I know have their routines
dialed in: patching together loads of steps in Power Query,
ducking into Excel for quick fixes, maybe popping open a notebook
when the built-in “transform” options finally tap out. That
patchwork gets the job done—until some missing or extra character
somewhere throws it all off. Piece by piece, things spiral. The
more hands on the pipeline, the more those tweaks, one-offs, and
“just this once” workarounds pile up. Suddenly, nobody knows if
you’re working with the right file, or if the logic that was so
carefully added to your ETL step last month even survived.Here’s
the reality: the more you glue together different tools and
manual scripts, the more you’re inviting things to go sideways.
Data quality problems start out small—maybe a few nulls in a
column, or an Excel formula that got misapplied—but they spread
quickly. You chase errors you can’t see. The business logic you
worked so hard to build in gets lost between tools. Then someone
copies a report or saves a “final” version in a shared folder.
Great, until you try to track why one number’s off and realize
there’s no audit trail, no history, just a chain of emails and a
spreadsheet with “_v2final_REAL” in the name.Now, let’s make it a
bit more concrete. Say you’ve set up a pipeline in Power Query to
transform your sales data. Someone on the ops team renames a
column, just to be helpful—cleans up the label, nothing major.
Overnight, your refresh fails. The dashboard lights up with
blanks. You spend your morning tracking through error messages,
retracing steps, and realizing one change silently broke the
whole chain. It’s one of those moments where you start wondering
if there’s a smarter way to do this. This is where Fabric
Notebooks start to make sense. They let you replace that chain of
hidden steps and scattered scripts with something centralized.
Open a Notebook inside the Lakehouse, and suddenly you’re not
locked into whatever Power Query exposes, or what some old VBA
script still supports. You use real Python or R. Your business
logic is now code—executable, testable, transparent. And since
Fabric Notebooks can talk directly to Spark, all the heavy
lifting happens right where your data lives. No more exporting
files, cutting and pasting formulas, or losing context between
tools.Transparency is the secret here. With Power BI dataflows or
legacy ETL tools, you get a UI and a list of steps, but it’s not
always clear what’s happening or why. Sometimes those steps are
black boxes; you see the outcome but tracing the logic can be a
headache. Notebooks flip that on its head. Every transformation,
every filter, every join is just code—easy to review, debug, and
repeat. If you need to fix something or explain it to an auditor,
you’re not trying to reverse-engineer a mouse click from six
months ago. You’re reading straightforward code that lives
alongside your data.If you want proof, talk to a data team that’s
been burned by a lost transformation. I’ve seen teams spend whole
days redoing work after Power Query steps vanished into
versioning limbo. Once they switched to Fabric Notebooks,
restoring a pipeline took minutes. Need to rerun a feature
engineering script? Hit run. Want to check the output? It’s right
there, alongside your transformations, not somewhere buried in
another platform’s log files.It’s not just anecdotal, either.
Gartner’s 2024 analytics trends point out that
developer-friendly, governed analytics environments are at the
top of IT wish lists this year. Teams want to govern workflows,
reduce errors, and keep transformations clear—not just for
compliance, but for sanity. Notebooks fit that brief. They bring
repeatability without sacrificing flexibility. You get what you
expect every single time you run your workflow, no matter if your
data has doubled in size or your logic has gotten a bit more
intricate.With Fabric Notebooks, you stop feeling at the mercy of
a UI or the latest patch to a plug-in. You write transformations
in native code, review the logic, iterate quickly, and keep
everything controlled within the Lakehouse environment.
Versioning is built in, so teams stop playing “which script is
the right one?” There’s no more mystery meat—every step is right
there in black and white, accessible to anyone with
permissions.So, what you really get is that rare mix of
flexibility and control. You aren’t tied down by a rigid workflow
or a limited set of built-in steps. But you’re not just
freewheeling either; everything happens in a secure, auditable,
repeatable way, right where your business data sits. For anyone
ready to ditch the endless cycle of clicks and patches, this is a
much-needed reset.And that’s what’s on offer—but seeing how it
all works together in a real end-to-end workflow is what matters
next. What does the journey look like when you go from raw
Lakehouse data to something ready for analysis or machine
learning, all inside the Notebook experience?


From Raw Lakehouse Data to Ready-for-ML: The Real
Workflow


You probably know the feeling—you upload a dump of last month’s
sales data, some web logs, maybe an extract from customer
support, and it all lands in your Lakehouse. Now what? Most folks
think you slap a model on top, press run, and call it AI. But the
real story is everything that happens in the messy middle. Raw
data looks nothing like what your ML algorithm needs, and before
you even think about training, someone has to piece it all
together. Columns don’t line up. Time zones are inconsistent.
Nulls wait to break scripts you haven’t written yet. If you’ve
tried to join logs across sources, you know that each system has
its own quirks—a date is never just a date, a customer ID might
be lowercased in one file and uppercased in another, and outliers
seem to multiply as soon as you ask serious questions.The huge
pain here is manual cleanup. Even if you’re good with VLOOKUPs or
Power Query, getting several million rows to a usable state isn’t
just boring, it opens the door to errors that don’t always
announce themselves. A missed join, a misplaced filter, or
inconsistent encoding adds hours of debugging later. The more
steps you run in different tools, the more you forget which fix
you made where. You end up cross-referencing transformations,
wondering if you cleaned out those four weird records, or if
someone else rebuilt the staging table without telling you.Fabric
Notebooks take that bottleneck and give you something that, for
once, scales with your ambition. Because you’re scripting
transformations directly in Python or R—right in the context of
your Lakehouse—you can chain cleaning, enrichment, and feature
engineering work in the way that actually matches your project,
not just whatever some library supports out of the box. This
isn’t dragging steps into a canvas and hoping the “advanced
editor” lets you tweak what matters. You’re designing the logic,
handling all the edge cases, and writing code once that you can
use again across datasets or even other projects. Every cast,
filter, and aggregate stays visible. Typed too fast and swapped a
column? Change it and rerun—no need to re-import, re-export, or
play the copy-paste game.Picture what this means for an actual
project. Take a retail team that wants to spot which customers
are about to churn. They’re not just loading the CRM export and
rolling the dice. Inside a Fabric Notebook, they pull in last
quarter’s sales, merge those records with support tickets, and
tag each touchpoint from the website logs. When they run into
missing values in the sales data—maybe several transactions
marked incomplete or with suspicious nulls—they clean those up on
the fly with a few lines of pandas or PySpark. Outliers that
would throw off their predictions get identified, flagged, and
handled right inside the workflow. Every part of this is code:
repeatable, easy to tweak, and visible to the next analyst or
developer who comes along. The team doesn’t have to circle back
to a BI developer or search through dozens of saved exports—they
see the entire process, from ingestion to the feature matrix, in
one place.Then there’s scale. Most platforms start strong but
choke when data grows. Fabric’s Native Notebook approach means
you’re not running local scripts on a laptop. Instead, each
transformation can harness Spark under the hood, so your process
that once broke at 100,000 records now sails through 10 million
without blinking. This is especially important when your data
doesn’t come in neat weekly batches. If the pipeline gets a surge
in records overnight, the code doesn’t care—it processes whatever
lands in the Lakehouse, and the same cleaning, transforms, and
feature engineering logic applies.If you mapped this out, you’d
start with a batch of raw tables landing in your Lakehouse. The
Notebook sits as the orchestrator, pulling data from source
tables, applying your scripted transformations, and immediately
saving the outputs back—either as new tables or as feature sets
ready for modeling. For viewers who picture this, think of data
flowing in, being reshaped and upgraded by your code, and then
moving straight into Power BI dashboards or ML pipelines, all
without a break in context or a switch to another
tool.Microsoft’s documentation highlights another piece most
teams miss: once your Notebook script is ready, you’re not stuck
waiting on someone else’s process to finish out the pipeline.
Notebooks in Fabric can trigger machine learning model training
jobs or write feature sets directly back to your Lakehouse, so
you’re not stuck exporting CSVs for some other tool to pick up.
This tight coupling means you design, clean, feature-engineer,
and prep for modeling all in one place, then kick off the next
step at scale.All of this means your workflow for ML or analytics
finally makes sense—start with raw ingestion, transform and
enrich inside a governed, scalable Notebook, and push the data
out for the next team or model to use. There’s no more losing
track between tools or asking, “Where did column X get
calculated?” It’s all right where you built it, and it works, no
matter how messy the raw data was.But seeing the flow is one
thing. To really design reliable, scalable projects, you need to
know exactly how these pieces talk to each other when you put
them into production. Let’s break down the connections behind the
scenes.


How the Pieces Fit: Lakehouse, Notebooks, and Spark in
Action


If you ask most teams what actually happens when they run a data
job in Fabric, you’ll get answers that sound confident—until
something fails. The Lakehouse, Notebooks, and Spark each get
talked up in demos, but in practice, a lot of folks treat these
like separate islands. It’s part of why pipelines break, or why a
process that ran fine during testing suddenly starts timing out
or throwing permission errors the second more people get
involved. So let’s strip away the buzzwords and get into what
actually happens when you put these pieces to work, side by
side.The Lakehouse is straightforward in concept. It’s where all
your raw data lands, gets curated, and, if you’ve done things
right, turns into a foundation for every dashboard, report, and
ML model you’re thinking of building. You can drop in CSVs from
cloud blobs, load up logs, or publish system exports—whatever
form your data takes, this is its home. It’s about having your
single source of truth in one place, and keeping both your messy
ingests and your golden, cleaned datasets under one roof. That’s
the theory, anyway.Now, Notebooks are your playground as a
developer or data analyst. If you’re tired of reverse-engineering
someone else’s Power Query or unpicking a worksheet that’s seen
ten rounds of copy-paste fixes, Notebooks feel like breathing
room. Here you write real code—Python, R, use your favorite
libraries, work through logic, build tests—and all without
leaving the context of your Lakehouse data. It’s not a bolt-on or
a disconnected tool. The Notebook is embedded right inside the
Fabric ecosystem, so everything you author runs close to where
your data sits.Spark is the heavy lifter, the compute engine
working behind the scenes. When you run a Notebook cell that
needs to process five million records—maybe it’s a complex join,
or a batch transformation—Spark takes over. It distributes the
job across its clusters, so your code runs at scale without you
writing custom job orchestration or worrying about where your
compute lives. This isn’t you spinning up servers, cloning
scripts, or knitting together permissions across random VMs. With
Fabric, Spark operates right where your curated and raw data is
stored.But, and here’s what often gets teams, if you treat these
three as separate, you hit problems. Teams will load data to the
Lakehouse, but then export it just to process it locally,
breaking governance and creating disconnected copies. Or they’ll
write great transformation logic in a Notebook, but only share
the output as a CSV, so nobody else can trace what actually
happened between ingest and publish. Sometimes Spark gets
sidelined, and workloads start running slow as people forget
they’re working with more data than their laptops can handle. The
end result is silos, confusion about who owns what, and security
risks that show up in unpleasant ways.What Fabric does—if you set
it up right—is keep every connection tight. Your Notebook isn’t
running code out in the void; it’s submitting Spark jobs that
execute exactly where the data is stored. Nothing leaves the
Lakehouse unless you explicitly export it. This means you skip
all the extra data movement, avoid random local files, and
control access in one place. If your organization is nervous
about compliance or data sovereignty, that single point of
control is a lot easier to document and manage.Think about a
finance team. They take in millions of daily transactions. Their
Notebook is set to trigger every night. Instead of someone
exporting yesterday’s CSV, cleaning the data in Excel, uploading
it again, and hoping no rows got dropped, the team has a Spark
job baked into their Notebook that ingests, joins, and processes
ten million transactions in minutes. The results show up as a
cleansed table, ready to plug into reporting in Power BI. Nobody
outside their team sees the raw dataset. They don’t move files
between systems. If there’s an error, the full lineage from
Lakehouse to final table is visible…and, crucially,
repeatable.Now, just because Notebooks give you flexibility
doesn’t mean you’re out on your own. You can bring in almost any
Python or R package you need for business logic or advanced
analytics. But the code still runs inside the guardrails that
Fabric provides. Version histories are kept so accidental changes
can be rolled back. Permissions wrap both Notebooks and the data
they touch, so you don’t end up with an analyst reading payroll
tables they shouldn’t have access to.To stay sane in a growing
project, it pays to group Notebooks by project or business
domain—marketing, sales, operations. Modularize your scripts so
you’re not copying the same cleaning logic everywhere. And even
if you’re just starting with a solo team, get version control in
place up front. It’s a lifesaver when something breaks, or when
you want to see why a filter got added.One of the most common
gotchas? Permissions. Too often, teams get enthusiastic and focus
on transformations, only to realize that anyone with access to
the Lakehouse or Notebook can overwrite data, or see more than
they should. Double-check who can run, edit, or even just view
your Notebooks. Set up access policies at both levels, not just
one. A leak or accidental overwrite doesn’t need to happen to
make you sweat—it just takes one bad incident to get everyone
looking sideways at your setup.When you actually understand how
your Lakehouse, Notebooks, and Spark mesh together, you get
stable pipelines. You control the flow from ingest to
transformation, through cleaning and enrichment, to analytics or
modeling. The pieces work as one—not separate fiefdoms. You also
keep your data secure, your logic visible, and your workflows
fast and repeatable. But as your project grows and more people
pile in, the challenge shifts. Suddenly, collaboration and
governance get a lot harder, and that’s where smart teams put
most of their attention.


Avoiding Chaos: Collaboration, Governance, and Scaling
Up


Think about the first time you spin up a Fabric Notebook for a
quick proof of concept. You connect your data, try out some
transformations, maybe even train a test model. It feels clean,
with just a handful of scripts and one or two people involved.
Fast forward a month and your workspace looks nothing like it did
on day one. Each team starts a handful of Notebooks, naming
conventions fall apart by the third iteration, and suddenly,
you’re searching for “final-final-customer-cleaning” instead of
anything standardized. Now add in more teams—finance, marketing,
operations. Someone requests access for a contractor “just for
the quarter,” and that’s when the real surprises begin.For most
organizations, this is where the fabric (no pun intended) starts
to fray. Business units all want their own slice of the data
pipeline, so they fork Notebooks, tweak scripts, and keep their
logic in copies scattered throughout the environment. Side
conversations move to Teams or email threads. Suddenly, two
people are doing almost the same work in parallel, but with
small, critical differences. With no governance, this drift is
only spotted when someone runs a report and the numbers don’t add
up. Someone will ask why a filter is missing or a metric jumped,
but between the duplicated notebooks and conflicting logic, the
root cause is buried under layers of undocumented
changes.Auditors and compliance officers, for their part, aren’t
just worried about business logic—they want to see who touched
what, and when. Without a system of auditing and version
management set up from day one, you’re stuck digging through old
emails, asking who had the file last. There’s no single source of
truth, and any data lineage story you can tell feels like
guesswork. More than once, this mess has landed teams in hot
water when an audit trail simply didn’t exist—or when a
permissions slip let someone view raw PII that should have been
locked down.Here’s where Fabric can actually make a difference,
but only if you use what’s built in. On the surface, it’s easy to
see Notebooks as just another script editor. Dig a bit deeper,
though, and Fabric gives some key tools for staying sane—starting
with workspace-level permissions. This isn’t the old model of
handing out blanket access or hoping someone remembers to update
a spreadsheet. Instead, you define exactly who can run, edit, or
even view specific Notebooks and tables. Missteps here are
usually unintentional—the difference between read and write can
sound like a detail until someone overwrites a production table
by accident. If you set the right roles up front, one slip
doesn’t take down the whole pipeline.Audit logs are another
underused safety net. Most teams think about logging after a
scare, but Fabric keeps a detailed record of changes made inside
Notebooks and data movement across the workspace. When a question
comes up in an audit (and it will), tracking every modification
is no longer a hero’s job; the logs are already waiting. This
means fewer late nights retracing steps and explaining how data
shifted between versions. The organizations that thrive here are
the ones that make reviewing audit logs part of their regular
process—not something reserved for emergencies.Consider a real
example: a healthcare organization handling protected health
information uses Fabric Notebooks to prepare patient records for
analysis. Compliance is non-negotiable. They enforce role-based
access from day one. No Notebook can interact with sensitive
fields unless the user has explicit permission—and every step is
versioned automatically. When an internal check rolls around, the
team doesn’t scramble. They pull logs, trace back exactly when
transformations ran, and demonstrate the lineage from original
data to cleaned, analysis-ready tables. This is what HIPAA asks
for, but the same approach works in any regulated
industry.Documentation is another pain point that everyone means
to solve but rarely does until onboarding devolves into legend
telling. If you document your transformations, tag versions at
meaningful checkpoints, and make notes about why code changed,
your team doesn’t spend days or even weeks guessing at business
logic. It’s about treating Notebooks less like scratch paper and
more like evolving project assets. The gains pay off every time a
new team member joins or someone picks up a pipeline months
later.For teams operating at scale, Git integration becomes more
than a nice-to-have. It’s where change tracking and a clear
branching strategy save you from accidental overwrites or the
accidental “oops” merge that wipes out a week’s work. This
structure keeps your master Notebook stable and allows
experimentation without risking the trusted production logic. The
reality is, even small teams benefit from using Git early in the
process, not waiting for chaos to set in.Of course, not every
pitfall is about access or versioning. When folks get
comfortable, shortcuts sneak in. Hard-coded credentials show up
as quick fixes and linger in code for too long. Pull requests, if
they happen, don’t always get a code review. Bugs and security
holes slip through not because people aren’t skilled, but because
process gets traded for speed. A necessary step is to build in
code review and credential checks from the first Notebook
onward—not as afterthoughts, but as part of everyday
work.According to Forrester’s 2023 findings, robust governance
isn’t just a compliance checkbox. It’s the most reliable
predictor that a data project will deliver real value, both in
agility and audit-readiness. Teams that get structure right from
the start find that Fabric Notebooks don’t just scale—they scale
without generating chaos.This setup turns what could be a mess
into a platform you actually trust as your organization grows.
Pipelines stay tidy, logic stays visible, and security lapses
become the exception, not the rule. So, if every team can get a
Notebook running, what really sets the pros apart? There’s one
habit that makes all the difference as Fabric Notebooks become
the backbone of your workflow.


Conclusion


Here’s what separates a smooth analytics setup from the usual
patchwork: it’s never just about writing good code. It’s how you
use Fabric Notebooks to make every part of your workflow visible,
consistent, and easy to manage, no matter how much your data
grows or how many hands are in the project. If you’ve lost a week
to tracking down issues that only existed because tools didn’t
connect right, you know the pain. Rethinking your approach now
pays off when your next project doubles in size. Let us know your
biggest data transformation struggle in the comments, and don’t
forget to subscribe.


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe