Using Microsoft Fabric Notebooks for AI Model Training

Ever tried to train an AI model on your laptop only to watch it
crawl for hours—or crash completely? You’re not alone. Most
business datasets have outgrown our local hardware. But what if
your entire multi-terabyte dataset was instantly accessible in
your training notebook—no extracts, no CSV chaos?Today, we’re
stepping into Microsoft Fabric’s built-in notebooks, where your
model training happens right next to your Lakehouse data. We’ll
break down exactly how this setup can save days in processing
time, while letting you work in Python or R without compromises.


When Big Data Outgrows Your Laptop


Imagine your laptop fan spinning loud enough to drown out your
meeting as you work through a spreadsheet. Now, replace that
spreadsheet with twelve terabytes of raw customer transactions,
spread across years of activity, with dozens of fields per
record. Even before you hit “run,” you already know this is going
to hurt. That’s exactly where a lot of marketing teams find
themselves. They’ve got a transactional database that could
easily be the backbone of an advanced AI project—predicting
churn, segmenting audiences, personalizing campaigns in near real
time—but their tools are still stuck on their desktops. They’re
opening files in Excel or a local Jupyter Notebook, slicing and
filtering in tiny chunks just to keep from freezing the machine,
and hoping everything holds together long enough to get results
they can use. When teams try to do this locally, the cracks show
quickly. Processing slows to a crawl, UI elements lag seconds
behind clicks, and export scripts that once took minutes now run
for hours. Even worse, larger workloads don’t just slow down—they
stop. Memory errors, hard drive thrashing, or kernel restarts
mean training runs don’t just take longer, they often never
finish. And when you’re talking about training an AI model,
that’s wasted compute, wasted time, and wasted opportunity. One
churn prediction attempt I’ve seen was billed as an “overnight
run” in a local Python environment. Twenty hours later, the
process finally failed because the last part of the dataset
pushed RAM usage over the limit. The team lost an entire day
without even getting a set of training metrics back. If that
sounds extreme, it’s becoming more common. Enterprise marketing
datasets have been expanding year over year, driven by richer
tracking, omnichannel experiences, and the rise of event-based
logging. Even a fairly standard setup—campaign performance logs,
web analytics, CRM data—can easily balloon to hundreds of
gigabytes. Big accounts with multiple product lines often end up
in the multi-terabyte range. The problem isn’t just storage
capacity. Large model training loads stress every limitation of a
local machine. CPUs peg at 100% for extended periods, and even
high-end GPUs end up idle while data trickles in too slowly. Disk
input/output becomes a constant choke point, especially if the
dataset lives on an external drive or network share. And then
there’s the software layer: once files get large enough, even
something as versatile as a Jupyter Notebook starts pushing its
limits. You can’t just load “data.csv” into memory when
“data.csv” is bigger than your SSD. That’s why many teams have
tried splitting files, sampling data, or building lightweight
stand-ins for their real production datasets. It’s a compromise
that keeps your laptop alive, but at the cost of losing insight.
Sampling can drop subtle patterns that would have boosted model
performance. Splitting files introduces all sorts of
inconsistencies and makes retraining more painful than it needs
to be. There’s a smarter way to skip that entire
download-and-import cycle. Microsoft Fabric shifts the heavy
lifting off your local environment entirely. Training moves into
the cloud, where compute resources sit right alongside the stored
data in the Lakehouse. You’re not shuttling terabytes back and
forth—you’re pushing your code to where the data already lives.
Instead of worrying about which chunk of your customer history
will fit in RAM, you can focus on the structure and logic of your
training run. And here’s the part most teams overlook: the real
advantage isn’t just the extra horsepower from cloud compute.
It’s the fact that you no longer have to move the data at all.


Direct Lakehouse Access: No More CSV Chaos


What if your notebook could pull in terabytes of data instantly
without ever flashing a “Downloading…” progress bar? No exporting
to CSV. No watching a loading spinner creep across the screen.
Just type the query, run it, and start working with the results
right there. That’s the difference when the data layer isn’t an
external step—it’s built into the environment you’re already
coding in. In Fabric, the Lakehouse isn’t just some separate
storage bucket you connect to once in a while. It’s the native
data layer for notebooks. That means your code is running in the
same environment where the data physically sits. You’re not
pushing millions of rows over the wire into your session. You’re
sending instructions to the data at its home location. The model
input pipeline isn’t a juggling act of exports and imports—it’s a
direct line from storage to Spark to whatever Python or R logic
you’re writing. If you’ve been in a traditional workflow, you
already know the usual pain points. Someone builds an extract
from the data warehouse, writes it out to a CSV, and hands it to
the data science team. Now the schema is frozen in time. The next
week, the source data changes and the extract is already stale.
In some cases, you even get two different teams each creating
their own slightly different exports, and now you’ve got
duplicated storage with mismatched definitions. Best case, that’s
just inefficiency. Worst case, it’s the reason two models trained
on “the same data” give contradictory predictions. One team I
worked with needed a filtered set of customer activity records
for a new churn model. They pulled everything from the warehouse
into a local SQL database, filtered it, then exported the result
set to a CSV for the training environment. That alone took nearly
a full day on their network. When new activity records were
loaded the next week, they had to do the entire process again
from scratch. By the time they could start actual training,
they’d spent more time wrangling files than writing code. The
performance hit isn’t just about the clock time for transfers.
Research across multiple enterprises shows consistent gains when
transformations run where the data is stored. When you can do the
joins, filters, and aggregations in place instead of downstream,
you cut out overhead, network hops, and redundant reads. Fabric
notebooks tap into Spark under the hood to make that possible, so
instead of pulling 400 million rows across your notebook session,
Spark executes that aggregation inside the Lakehouse environment
and only returns the results your model needs. If you’re working
in Python or R, you’re not starting from a bare shell either.
Fabric comes with a stack of libraries already integrated for
large-scale work—PySpark, pandas-on-Spark, sparklyr, and more—so
distributed processing is an option from the moment you open a
new notebook. That matters when you’re joining fact and dimension
tables in the hundreds of gigabytes, or when you need to compute
rolling windows across several years of customer history. As soon
as the query completes, the clean, aggregated dataset is ready to
move directly into your feature engineering process. There’s no
intermediary phase of saving to disk, checking schema, and
re-importing into a local training notebook. You’ve skipped an
entire prep stage. Teams used to spend days just aligning columns
and re-running filters when source data changed. With this setup,
they can be exploring feature combinations for the model within
the same hour the raw data was updated. And that’s where it gets
interesting—because once you have clean, massive datasets flowing
directly into your notebook session, the way you think about
building features starts to change.


Feature Engineering and Model Selection at Scale


Your dataset might be big enough to predict just about anything,
but that doesn’t mean every column in it belongs in your model.
The difference between a model that produces meaningful
predictions and one that spits out noise often comes down to how
you select and shape your features. Scale gives you
possibilities—but it also magnifies mistakes. With massive
datasets, throwing all raw fields at your algorithm isn’t just
messy—it can actively erode performance. More columns mean more
parameters to estimate, and more opportunities for your model to
fit quirks in the training data that don’t generalize.
Overfitting becomes easier, not harder, when the feature set is
bloated. On top of that, every extra variable means more
computation. Even in a well-provisioned cloud environment, 500
raw features will slow training, increase memory use, and
complicate every downstream step compared to a lean set of 50
well-engineered ones. The hidden cost isn’t always obvious from
the clock. That “500-feature” run might finish without errors,
but it could leave you with a model that’s marginally more
accurate on the training data and noticeably worse on new data.
When you shrink and refine those features—merging related
variables, encoding categories more efficiently, or building
aggregates that capture patterns instead of raw values—you cut
down compute time while actually improving how well the model
predicts the future. Certain data shapes make this harder.
High-cardinality features, like unique product SKUs or customer
IDs, can explode into thousands of encoded columns if handled
naively. Sparse data, where most fields are empty for most
records, can hide useful signals but burn resources storing and
processing mostly missing values. In something like customer
churn prediction, you may also have temporal patterns—purchase
cycles, seasonal activity, onboarding phases—that don’t show up
in ordinary static fields. Feature engineering at this scale
means designing transformations that condense and surface the
patterns without flooding the dataset with noise. That’s where
automation and distributed processing tools start paying off.
Libraries like Featuretools can automate the generation of
aggregates and rolling features across large relational datasets.
In Fabric, those transformations can run on Spark, so you can
scale out creation of hundreds of candidate features without
pulling everything into a single machine’s memory. Time-based
groupings, customer-level aggregates, ratios between related
metrics—all of these can be built and tested iteratively without
breaking your workflow. Once you’ve curated your feature set,
model selection becomes its own balancing act. Different
algorithms interact with large-scale data in different ways.
Gradient boosting frameworks like XGBoost or LightGBM can handle
large tabular datasets efficiently, but they still pay the cost
per feature in both memory and iteration time. Logistic
regression scales well and trains quickly, but it won’t capture
complex nonlinear relationships unless you build those into the
features yourself. Deep learning models can, in theory, discover
richer patterns, but they also demand more tuning and more
compute—in Fabric’s environment, you can provision that, but
you’ll need to weigh whether the gains justify the training cost.
The good news is that with Fabric notebooks directly tied into
your Lakehouse, you can test these strategies without the
traditional bottlenecks. You can spin up multiple training runs
with different feature sets and algorithms, using the same
underlying data without having to reload or reshape it for each
attempt. That ability to iterate quickly means you’re not locked
into a guess about which approach will work best—you can measure
and decide. Well-engineered features matched to the right model
architecture can cut runtimes significantly, drop memory usage,
and still boost accuracy on unseen data. You get faster
experimentation cycles and more reliable results, and you spend
your compute budget on training that actually matters instead of
processing dead weight. Next comes the step that keeps these
large-scale runs productive: monitoring and evaluating them in
real time so you know exactly what’s happening while the model
trains in the cloud.


Training, Monitoring, and Evaluating at Cloud Scale


Training on gigabytes of data sounds like the dream—until you’re
sitting there wondering if the job is still running or if it
quietly died an hour ago. When everything happens in the cloud,
you lose the instant feedback you get from watching logs fly past
in a local terminal. That’s fine if the job will finish in
minutes. It’s a problem when the clock runs into hours and you
have no idea whether you’re making progress. Running training in
a remote environment changes how you think about visibility. In a
local session, you spot issues immediately—missing values in a
field, a data type mismatch, or an import hang. On a cloud
cluster, that same error might be buried in a log file you don’t
check until much later. And because the resources are provisioned
and billed while the process is technically “running,” every
minute of a failed run is still money spent. The cost of catching
a problem too late adds up quickly. I’ve seen a churn prediction
job that was kicked off on a Friday evening with an eight-hour
estimate. On Monday morning, the team realized it had failed
before the first epoch even started—because one column that
should have been numeric loaded as text. The actual runtime? Ten
wasted minutes up front, eight billed hours on the meter. That’s
the kind of mistake that erodes confidence in the process and
slows iteration cycles to a crawl. Fabric tackles this with
real-time job monitoring you can open alongside your notebook.
You get live metrics on memory consumption, CPU usage, and
progress through the training epochs. Logs stream in as the job
runs, so you can spot warnings or errors before they turn into
full-blown failures. If something looks off, you can halt the run
right there instead of learning the hard way later. It’s not just
about watching, though. You can set up checkpoints during
training so the model’s state is saved periodically. If the job
stops—whether because of an error, resource limit, or intentional
interruption—you can restart from the last checkpoint instead of
starting from scratch. Versioning plays a role here too. By
saving trained model versions with their parameters and
associated data splits, you can revisit a past configuration
without having to re-create the entire environment that produced
it. Intermediate saves aren’t just a nice safeguard—they’re what
make large-scale experimentation feasible. You can branch off a
promising checkpoint and try different hyperparameters without
paying the time cost of reloading and retraining the base model.
With multi-gigabyte datasets, that can mean the difference
between running three experiments in a day or just one. Once the
model finishes, evaluation at this scale comes with its own set
of challenges. You can’t always score against the full test set
in one pass without slowing things to a crawl. Balanced sampling
helps here, keeping class proportions while cutting the dataset
to a size that evaluates faster. For higher accuracy, distributed
evaluation lets you split the scoring task across the cluster,
with results aggregated automatically. Fabric supports Python
libraries like MLlib and distributed scikit-learn workflows to
make that possible. Instead of waiting for a single machine to
run metrics on hundreds of millions of records, you can fan the
task out and pull back the consolidated accuracy, precision,
recall, or F1 scores in a fraction of the time. The data never
leaves the Lakehouse, so you’re not dealing with test set exports
or manual merges. By the time you see the final metrics—say, a
churn predictor evaluated over gigabytes of test data—you’ve also
got the full training history, resource usage patterns, and any
intermediate versions you saved. That’s a complete picture,
without a single CSV download or a late-night “is this thing
working?” moment. And when you can trust every run to be visible,
recoverable, and fully evaluated at scale, the way you think
about building projects in this environment starts to shift
completely.


Conclusion


Training right next to your data in Fabric doesn’t just make
things faster—it removes the ceiling you’ve been hitting with
local hardware. You can run bigger experiments, test more ideas,
and actually use the full dataset instead of cutting it down to
fit. That changes how quickly you can move from concept to a
reliable model. If you haven’t tried it yet, spin up a small
project in a Fabric Notebook with Lakehouse integration before
your next major AI build. You’ll see the workflow shift
immediately. In the next video, we’ll map out automated ML
pipelines and deployment—without ever leaving Fabric.


Get full access to M365 Show - Microsoft 365 Digital Workplace
Daily at m365.show/subscribe