Anmeldung Registrierung
Auto Hell Dunkel
Erweiterte Suche
  1. Startseite
  2. Podcasts
  3. Wo ich schon mal da bin Podcast
  4. 03 - KI, Dystopien und süße kleine Robben
Gast: Prof. Dr. Kerstin Prechel

In unserer dritten Folge sprechen wir mit KI- und Ethik-Expertin
Prof. Dr. Kerstin Prechel über die neuen Herausforderungen an
Ärzte, aber auch an uns alle, die durch das Fortschreiten der
KI-Technologien auf uns warten. Es geht außerdem um kleine
Roboter mit Strickmützchen, niedliche Robben und Hollywood -
irgendwie.

Eine Folge, nach der es definitiv mehr Fragen als vorher gibt
...

Shownotes:

Relevante Studien zum Thema KI und Medizin: 

(Buchempfehlung nicht wissenschaftlich: Marc-Uwe Kling "Views")

Abdul-Kader, S. A., & Woods, J.
(2015).

Survey on chatbot design techniques in speech conversation
systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and
Applications, 6(7), 72-80.

Alvarado, R. (2022).

What kind of trust does AI deserve, if any? AI and Ethics. DOI:
10.1007/s43681-022-00224-x.

Amann, J., Vetter, D., Blomberg, S.N., Christensen, H.C.,
Coffee, M., Gerke, S., Gilbert, T.K., Hagendorff, T., Holm, S.,
Livne, M., Spezzatti, A., Strümke, I., Zicari, R.V., & Madai,
V.I. (2022).

To explain or not to explain? Artificial intelligence
explainability in clinical decision support systems. PLOS Digital
Health 1(2), e0000016. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000016 [Open
Access].

Arbelaez Ossa, L., Starke, G., Lorenzini, G., Vogt, J.E.,
Shaw, D.M., & Elger, B.S. (2022).

Re-focusing explainability in medicine. Digital Health, 8. DOI:
10.1177/20552076221074488 [Open Access].

Babushkina, D. (2022).

Are we justified attributing a mistake in diagnosis to an AI
diagnostic system? AI and Ethics. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-022-00189-x
[Open Access].

Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale,
E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000).

SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application
to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist, 5(4), 302-311.

Benrimoh, D., Hawco, C., & Fratila, R.
(2020).

Using artificial intelligence to support patients facing cancer:
From chatbot to clinical decision-making tools. Current Oncology
Reports, 22(11), 1-8.

Bickmore, T. W., & Giorgino, T.
(2006).

Health dialog systems for patients and consumers. Journal of
Biomedical Informatics, 39(5), 556-571.

Bickmore, T. W., & Schulman, D.
(2011).

Practical approaches to comforting patients with relational
agents. Interacting with Computers, 23(3), 279-288.

Bleher, H., & Braun, M. (2022).

Diffused responsibility: Attributions of responsibility in the
use of AI-driven clinical decision support systems. AI and
Ethics, 2(4), 747-761. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-022-00135-x [Open
Access].

Chen, H., Gomez, C., Huang, C.-M., & Unberath, M.
(2022).

Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design:
Guidelines and evidence from a systematic review. npj Digital
Medicine, 5, 156. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00699-2 [Open Access].

Combi, C., Amico, B., Bellazzi, R., Holzinger, A., Moore,
J.H., Zitnik, M., & Holmes, J.H. (2022).

A manifesto on explainability for artificial intelligence in
medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 133, 102423. DOI:
10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102423 [Open Access].

Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S.
M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017).

Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep
neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115-118.

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019).

A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard
Data Science Review, 1(1), 1-15.

Friedrich, A.B., Mason, J., & Malone, J.R.
(2022).

Rethinking explainability: Toward a postphenomenology of
black-box artificial intelligence in medicine. Ethics and
Information Technology, 24, 8. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-022-09631-4.

Funer, F. (2022).

Accuracy and Interpretability: Struggling with the Epistemic
Foundations of Machine Learning-Generated Medical Information and
Their Practical Implications for the Doctor-Patient Relationship.
Philosophy & Technology 35(5). DOI:
10.1007/s13347-022-00505-7 [Open Access].

Funer, F. (2022).

The Deception of Certainty: how Non-Interpretable Machine
Learning Outcomes Challenge the Epistemic Authority of
Physicians. A deliberative-relational Approach. Medicine, Health
Care and Philosophy, 25, 167–178. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10076-1
[Open Access].

Gardner, A., Smith, A.L., Steventon, A., Coughlan, E.,
& Oldfield, M. (2022).

Ethical funding for trustworthy AI: Proposals to address the
responsibility of funders to ensure that projects adhere to
trustworthy AI practice. AI and Ethics, 2, 277–291.

Grote, T., & Berens, P. (2020).

On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare.
Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(3), 205-211.

Hallowell, N., Badger, S., Sauerbrei, A., Nellåker, C.,
& Kerasidou, A. (2022).

“I don’t think people are ready to trust these algorithms at face
value”: Trust and the use of machine learning algorithms in the
diagnosis of rare disease. BMC Medical Ethics, 23, 112. DOI:
10.1186/s12910-022-00842-4 [Open Access].

Hasani, N., Morris, M.A., Rhamim, A., Summers, R.M.,
Jones, E., Siegel, E., & Saboury, B. (2022).

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. PET Clin,
17(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.09.007.

Herzog, C. (2022).

On the risk of confusing interpretability with explicability. AI
and Ethics, 2, 219–225.

Herzog, C. (2022).

On the ethical and epistemological utility of explicable AI in
medicine. Philosophy & Technology, 35, 50. DOI:
10.1007/s13347-022-00546-y [Open Access].

Hatherley, J., Sparrow, R., & Howard, M.
(2022).

The virtues of interpretable medical artificial intelligence.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. DOI:
10.1017/S0963180122000305 [Open Access].

Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S.,
... & Wang, Y. (2017).

Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future.
Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230-243.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E.
(2019).

The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine
Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.

Kawamleh, S. (2022).

Against explainability requirements for ethical artificial
intelligence in health care. AI and Ethics. DOI:
10.1007/s43681-022-00212-1.

Kawamleh, S. (2022).

Against explainability requirements for ethical artificial
intelligence in health care. AI and Ethics. DOI:
10.1007/s43681-022-00212-1.

Kemp, H., Freyer, N., & Nagel, S.K.
(2022).

Justice and the normative standards of explainability in
healthcare. Philosophy & Technology 35, 100. DOI:
10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0 [Open Access].

Kerasidou, C., Kerasidou, A., Buscher, M., &
Wilkinson, S. (2022).

Before and beyond trust: Reliance in medical AI. Journal of
Medical Ethics, 48(11), 852–856. DOI: 10.113

Kiseleva, A., Kotzinos, D., & De Hert, P.
(2022).

Transparency of AI in healthcare as a multilayered system of
accountabilities: Between legal requirements and technical
limitations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 879603.
DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.879603.

Lütge, C. (2020).

Ethik der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Springer.

Lütge, C., & Maas, J. (2021).

The Ethics of AI and Robotics: A German Perspective. In Ethics of
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics: Fundamentals and
Applications (pp. 33-51). Springer.

McDougall, R. J. (2019).

Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical
AI. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(3), 156-160.

McTear, M. F., Callejas, Z., & Griol, D.
(2016).

The role of conversational agents in healthcare: A literature
review. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(7), 1-12.

Milne-Ives, M., de Cock, C., Lim, E., Shehadeh, M. H., de
Pennington, N., Mole, G., & Meinert, E.
(2020).

The effectiveness of artificial intelligence conversational
agents in health care: Systematic review. Journal of Medical
Internet Research, 22(10), e20346.

Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A.
(2020).

From what to how: An initial review of publicly available AI
ethics tools, methods, and research to translate principles into
practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2141-2168.

Ott, T., & Dabrock, P. (2022).

Transparent human – (non-)transparent technology? The Janus-faced
call for transparency in AI-based health care technologies.
Frontiers in Genetics 13, 902960. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.902960
[Open Access].

Petch, J., Di, S., & Nelson, W.
(2022).

Opening the black box. The promise and limitations of explainable
machine learning in cardiology. Canadian Journal of Cardiology
38(2), 204–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.09.004 [Open Access].

Rajpurkar, P., Irvin, J., Zhu, K., Yang, B., Mehta, H.,
Duan, T., ... & Ng, A. Y. (2017).

CheXNet: Radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays
with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225.

Salahuddin, Z., Woodruff, H.C., Chatterjee, A., &
Lambin, P. (2022).

Transparency of deep neural networks for medical image analysis.
A review of interpretability methods. Computers in Biology and
Medicine 140, 105111. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105111 [Open
Access].

Sand, M., Durán, J.M., & Jongsma, K.R.
(2022).

Responsibility beyond design: Physicians’ requirements for
ethical medical AI. Bioethics 36(2), 162–169. DOI:
10.1111/bioe.12887 [Open Access].

Schmitz, R., Werner, R., Repici, A., Bisschops, R.,
Meining, A., Zornow, M., Messmann, H., Hassan, C., Sharma, P.,
& Rösch, T. (2022).

Artificial intelligence in GI endoscopy: Stumbling blocks, gold
standards and the role of endoscopy societies. Gut 71(3),
451–454. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323115.

Shickel, B., Tighe, P. J., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P.
(2018).

Deep EHR: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques
for electronic health record (EHR) analysis. IEEE Journal of
Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(5), 1589-1604.

Starke, G., & van den Brule, R., Elger, B.S., &
Haselager, P. (2022).

Intentional machines: A defence of trust in medical artificial
intelligence. Bioethics 36, 154–161.

Starke, G., & Ienca, M. (2022).

Misplaced trust and distrust: How not to engage with medical
artificial intelligence. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare
Ethics. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180122000445 [Open Access].

Topol, E. J. (2019).

High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and
artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.

Ursin, F., Timmermann, C., & Steger, F.
(2022).

Explicability of artificial intelligence in radiology: Is a fifth
bioethical principle conceptually necessary? Bioethics 36(2),
143–153. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12918 [Open Access].

Verdicchio, M., & Perin, A. (2022).

When doctors and AI interact: On human responsibility for
artificial risks. Philosophy & Technology 35, 11. DOI:
10.1007/s13347-022-00506-6 [Open Access].

Wadden, J.J. (2022).

Defining the undefinable: The black box problem in healthcare
artificial intelligence. Journal of Medical Ethics 48(10),
764–768. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107529.

Winter, P., & Carusi, A. (2022).

‘If you’re going to trust the machine, then that trust has got to
be based on something’: Validation and the co-constitution of
trust in developing artificial intelligence (AI) for the early
diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Science &
Technology Studies 35(4), 58–77. DOI: 10.23987/sts.102198 [Open
Access].

Winter, P.D., & Carusi, A. (2022).

(De)troubling transparency: Artificial intelligence (AI) for
clinical applications. Medical Humanities. DOI:
10.1136/medhum-2021-012318.

Yoon, C.H., Torrance, R., & Scheinerman, N.
(2022).

Machine learning in medicine: Should the pursuit of enhanced
interpretability be abandoned? Journal of Medical Ethics 48(9),
581–585. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107102 [Open Access].

Yu, K. H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S.
(2018).

Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nature Biomedical
Engineering, 2(10), 719-731.

Verwendete Musik

"Sunrise-Groove" von Top-Flow über Pixabay

Podcast-Anbieter:

JuDerm (Junge Dermatologen) im Berufsverband der
Deutschen Dermatologen e.V., Schumannstr. 18, 10117 Berlin,
⁠info(at)juderm(dot)de⁠

Berufsverband der Deutschen Dermatologen
e.V.
Präsident: Dr. med. Ralph von Kiedrowski

Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg

Registernummer: VR 26835B

Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer: DE 229406899 

Plattform der EU zur außergerichtlichen Online-Streitbeilegung:
⁠http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr⁠.

Wir sind weder verpflichtet noch bereit, an
Streitbeilegungsverfahren vor einer Verbraucherschlichtungsstelle
teilzunehmen.

Für redaktionelle Inhalte verantwortlich gemäß § 18 Abs.
2 MStV

Wolfgang Hardt, Berufsverband der Deutschen Dermatologen e.V.
Episode melden

„03 - KI, Dystopien und süße kleine Robben“

Worum geht es? Danach fragen wir noch nach dem Grund.

Abonnenten

Teilen

Mein Archiv

Deine Privatkopie der Folgen, die du nicht verlieren willst.

Podcast-Folgen verschwinden. Feeds werden auf die letzten Episoden gekürzt, Hoster räumen alte Dateien ab, Formate wechseln den Anbieter und lassen ihr Archiv zurück. Mit „Mein Archiv“ sichert podcast.de die Folgen deiner Podcasts für dich — angefangen bei den ältesten, denn die sind zuerst weg.

  • Deine gesicherten Folgen bleiben hörbar, auch wenn das Original offline geht.
  • Auch Folgen, die im heutigen Feed gar nicht mehr stehen — podcast.de kennt sie noch.
  • Herunterladen bleibt möglich, solange die Folge beim Podcaster liegt. Der zählt seine Abrufe wie bisher.
Startet bald

Sei beim Start von Mein Archiv dabei

Mein Archiv ist fast fertig. Trag dich ein, dann bekommst du eine E-Mail, sobald es losgeht – und bist von Anfang an dabei. Wir schreiben dir nur zum Start, keine Werbung, keine Weitergabe deiner Daten.

Du bekommst zuerst eine Bestätigungsmail. Abmelden geht jederzeit. Datenschutz