Explanations That Are Often Wrong Part II
This episode features: -Can political symbols change political
beliefs? -What makes pseudoscience appealing -How to evaluate
futurism -How do chronically accessible concepts change our
perception -How to think about the complexity of theories...
28 Minuten
Podcast
Podcaster
Beschreibung
vor 7 Jahren
This episode features:
-Can political symbols change political beliefs?
-What makes pseudoscience appealing
-How to evaluate futurism
-How do chronically accessible concepts change our perception
-How to think about the complexity of theories
-Priming: fact or fiction?
-Can barely-noticeable changes in the environment have big
effects on behavior?
Full transcript
-References-
Unapplied Rationality:
Carter, T. J., Ferguson, M. J., & Hassin, R. R. (2011). A
single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward
Republicanism up to 8 months later. Psychological science, 22(8),
1011-1018.
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams Jr, R. B.,
Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., ... & Cemalcilar, Z. (2014).
Investigating variation in replicability. Social psychology.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: W.W. Norton
& Co.
Sperber, R. D., McCauley, C., Ragain, R. D., & Weil, C. M.
(1979). Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing.
Memory & Cognition, 7(5), 339-345.
Mysterious Answers to Mysterious Questions
Check This Rec:
Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching fire: How cooking made us human.
Basic Books.
Announcement:
I will not be releasing episodes in December. The next
episode will come out in January.
Weitere Episoden
48 Sekunden
vor 2 Jahren
45 Minuten
vor 6 Jahren
27 Minuten
vor 6 Jahren
35 Minuten
vor 6 Jahren
44 Minuten
vor 6 Jahren
In Podcasts werben
Kommentare (0)