New Amendment To 'Son of Sam' Law Could Strip Asa Ellerup Of Million Dollar Payday

In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski,
alongside psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, delves into
the contentious issue surrounding Asa Ellerup's potential
million-dollar payday from a documentary. This Peacock Network
project, produced by 50 Cent's G Unit Productions, has raised a
storm of debate, particularly around the expansion of the Son of
Sam law in New York.
 
 Asa Ellerup, embroiled in the chilling narrative of her
husband Rex Heuermann, alleged to be the Long Island serial
killer, finds herself at a controversial crossroads. The proposed
legislative amendment aims to prevent relatives of defendants,
like Ellerup, from profiting off criminal cases. This potential
law change has garnered support from Attorney John Ray, who
represents some of the victims' families. But the broader
implications of this legal shift bring a complex ethical dilemma
to the forefront.
 
 Scott, contributing her expert insights, echoes Brueski’s
concerns over the broad reach of such legislation. While the
public sentiment leans towards disallowing Ellerup from profiting
off the tragic circumstances, the law could inadvertently
penalize genuine victims like Kerri Rawson. Rawson, the daughter
of the BTK killer, has channeled her traumatic experience into
victim advocacy. A blanket law like the proposed one could
unjustly strip individuals like her of their legitimate earnings
and impede their advocacy work.
 
 The conversation takes a deeper dive into the intricacies
of legislating against profiteering in crime-related scenarios.
Scott points out the challenge in legislating intent, a crucial
element in differentiating cases like Ellerup’s from others. The
timing of the documentary, amidst ongoing legal proceedings
against Rex Heuermann, adds to the unease surrounding Ellerup’s
role in the saga.
 
 As Brueski and Scott explore, the intent behind Ellerup’s
involvement in the documentary remains a gray area. If Ellerup is
eventually found to have no involvement in the crimes, her
narrative could be seen in a different light. However, the
speculative nature of the documentary’s goals, potentially aimed
at implicating her further, casts a shadow on her
intentions.
 
 The discussion then shifts to the potential consequences of
such a documentary. Drawing parallels with Robert Durst’s
self-incrimination in "The Jinx," Brueski speculates on the
documentary’s possible outcomes. If Ellerup inadvertently
incriminates herself, the million-dollar deal could ironically
transition from a lucrative opportunity to a source of funds in
prison.
 
 This episode of "Hidden Killers" leaves listeners with a
thought-provoking dilemma: balancing the need to prevent the
exploitation of criminal cases for profit, against the risk of
unjustly penalizing those who seek to use their personal
tragedies for positive advocacy. As Scott aptly puts it, the
solution might lie in nuanced legislation, tailored to address
specific scenarios without overreaching into the lives of
innocent victims turned advocates. As the legal and moral debate
continues, the question remains: How can the law equitably
distinguish between opportunistic profiteering and genuine victim
advocacy?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe
through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free:
https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases:
https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting
Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the
Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex
Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent
Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of
Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more!
Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com