Watergate Expert Geoff Shepard Drops Bombshell on Biden's Special Prosecutor
Today, The Two Mikes welcomed Geoff Shepard, America’s foremost
authority on Watergate, back to the program to discuss document
authored for the Supreme Court’s consideration by President
Reagan’s Attorney General, Edward Meese and his associates...
1 Stunde 1 Minute
Podcast
Podcaster
Dr Michael Scheuer & Colonel Mike co-host Two Mikes. This show discusses current events from a Pro-America, Constitutional perspective. These two have guest hosted radio shows for 6 years and are excited to join with like minded people on the new...
Beschreibung
vor 1 Jahr
Today, The Two Mikes welcomed Geoff Shepard,
America’s foremost authority on Watergate, back to the program to
discuss document authored for the Supreme Court’s consideration by
President Reagan’s Attorney General, Edward Meese and his
associates Steven Calibrese and Gray Lawson.
The document – called an amicus brief – argues that the Biden
Administration’s chief Special Prosecutor in the multi-prong effort
to find some way to jail Donald Trump is not qualified to hold that
position. Why? Well, the why has nothing to do with his university
credentials or his admission to the bar. Rather, Meese’s argument
pivots off several points.
The first is that although Mr. Smith was an employee of the
Department of Justice at the time of his appointment, he was not
serving there as an attorney. Because of this fact, Meese argues,
that Smith was required to have the Senate’s approval by vote
before he can serve to as special prosecutor, and that without it
he is disqualified to serve as such (NB: Mr. Shepard points
out that the Biden Administration also failed to request the
Senate’s sanction for Robert Mueller to serve as the special
prosecutor for the case against Trump on the Russia issue.)
Mr. Shepard noted that the appointments clause of Article III of
the U.S. Constitution is a bit vague, but it seems to suggest that
Meese’s document may be on point, on the basis of both the Article
III clause and other federal law. In any event, Mr. Shepard
concluded, Meese’s document has some merit and appears to present a
serious requirement for a hearing before the Supreme Court. ---Mr.
Shepard's website is at: https://www.shepardonwatergate.com --Mr.
Shepard’s authoritative three-volume dissection of the Watergate
Affair is available at Amazon and many other booksellers.
Sponsors
Triangle Fragrance:
https://trianglefragrance.com/?sca_ref=4171318.dUndUHDKz3
Cambridge Credit: https://www.cambridge-credit.org/twomikes/
EMP Shield: https://www.empshield.com/?coupon=twomikes
Our Gold Guy: https://www.ourgoldguy.com
www.TwoMikes.us
America’s foremost authority on Watergate, back to the program to
discuss document authored for the Supreme Court’s consideration by
President Reagan’s Attorney General, Edward Meese and his
associates Steven Calibrese and Gray Lawson.
The document – called an amicus brief – argues that the Biden
Administration’s chief Special Prosecutor in the multi-prong effort
to find some way to jail Donald Trump is not qualified to hold that
position. Why? Well, the why has nothing to do with his university
credentials or his admission to the bar. Rather, Meese’s argument
pivots off several points.
The first is that although Mr. Smith was an employee of the
Department of Justice at the time of his appointment, he was not
serving there as an attorney. Because of this fact, Meese argues,
that Smith was required to have the Senate’s approval by vote
before he can serve to as special prosecutor, and that without it
he is disqualified to serve as such (NB: Mr. Shepard points
out that the Biden Administration also failed to request the
Senate’s sanction for Robert Mueller to serve as the special
prosecutor for the case against Trump on the Russia issue.)
Mr. Shepard noted that the appointments clause of Article III of
the U.S. Constitution is a bit vague, but it seems to suggest that
Meese’s document may be on point, on the basis of both the Article
III clause and other federal law. In any event, Mr. Shepard
concluded, Meese’s document has some merit and appears to present a
serious requirement for a hearing before the Supreme Court. ---Mr.
Shepard's website is at: https://www.shepardonwatergate.com --Mr.
Shepard’s authoritative three-volume dissection of the Watergate
Affair is available at Amazon and many other booksellers.
Sponsors
Triangle Fragrance:
https://trianglefragrance.com/?sca_ref=4171318.dUndUHDKz3
Cambridge Credit: https://www.cambridge-credit.org/twomikes/
EMP Shield: https://www.empshield.com/?coupon=twomikes
Our Gold Guy: https://www.ourgoldguy.com
www.TwoMikes.us
Weitere Episoden
46 Minuten
vor 11 Monaten
51 Minuten
vor 1 Jahr
45 Minuten
vor 1 Jahr
42 Minuten
vor 1 Jahr
In Podcasts werben
Kommentare (0)