Ep. 210: The First Amendment at the Supreme Court
“I have never seen a Supreme Court term that is as consequential as
this one is going to be,” said FIRE Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere,
this term’s First Amendment cases. On today’s show, we analyze the
oral arguments in four of those cases:...
1 Stunde 23 Minuten
Podcast
Podcaster
Beschreibung
vor 1 Jahr
“I have never seen a Supreme Court term that is as consequential
as this one is going to be,” said FIRE Chief Counsel Bob
Corn-Revere, previewing this term’s First Amendment cases.
On today’s show, we analyze the oral arguments in four of those
cases: NRA v. Vullo, Murthy v. Missouri (formerly Missouri v.
Biden), Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC, v. Paxton.
We also discuss the court’s decision in two cases involving
government officials blocking their critics on social media.
Joining the show are Corn-Revere, FIRE General Counsel Ronnie
London, and FIRE Director of Public Advocacy Aaron Terr.
Timestamps
0:00 Introduction
3:29 NRA v. Vullo
26:05 Murthy v. Missouri
50:41 Netchoice cases
1:11:26 Lindke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier
1:21:24 Outro
Show Notes
NRA v. Vullo oral argument transcript
Bantam Books, Inc. et. al v Sullivan et al. (1963)
Murthy v. Missouri oral argument transcript
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC oral argument transcript
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton oral argument transcript
Lindke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier decisions
‘So to Speak’ on Substack
Transcript
Weitere Episoden
1 Stunde 9 Minuten
vor 5 Monaten
1 Stunde 11 Minuten
vor 6 Monaten
47 Minuten
vor 6 Monaten
1 Stunde 6 Minuten
vor 7 Monaten
60 Minuten
vor 7 Monaten
In Podcasts werben
Kommentare (0)