Trooper 2 Step Exceptions

In this archive episode, Dennis explains a few circumstances where
the Trooper 2 Step is not necessarily required to gain lawful
entry. Recorded on 11/07/2020. Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33
(1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court
held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to
inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free
to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973), was a U.S. Supreme
Court case that ruled that in a case involving a consent search,
knowledge of a right to refuse consent is a factor in determining
whether a grant of consent to a search was voluntary, the state
does not need to prove that the person who granted consent to
search knew of the right to refuse consent under the Fourth
Amendment. United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976), was a case
decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that decided that
a warrantless arrest in public and consenting to a vehicle search
did not violate the Fourth Amendment. If you like what you are
hearing and want to stay in the loop with the latest in Street Cop
Training, please follow our Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/StreetCopTraining