Quit Playing Logic Games with Our Hearts

If you’re studying for the LSAT, you’ve probably heard that Logic
Games will soon be a thing of the past. But will they really?
Why? When? And what will replace them?


Branden & Jelena break down the recent settlement in Binno v.
LSAC, which may fundamentally change the LSAT in the next few
years.


In this episode, you’ll find out . . .
What LSAC really committed to regarding Logic Games Why
plaintiff Angelo Binno previously sued the American Bar Association
over the same issue (and was rejected by the Supreme Court) How
prospective law students with visual impairments dealt with the
LSAT’s Logic Games section in the past What current LSAT students
who struggle with this section should do about Logic Games—keep
studying, or wait? When we can expect to see a change to the
Analytical Reasoning section What Analytical Reasoning is, anyway

Links and further resources from from this week’s episode:



Binno’s Complaint Against LSAC (PDF):
https://bit.ly/36XnGhR



Joint Press Release from Binno & LSAC on Settlement:
http://prn.to/3jJritb



LSAC’s Now-Deleted Second Statement:
https://i.redd.it/k5bm8hjgbgr31.jpg



ABA Journal on the LSAC/Binno Settlement:
http://bit.ly/3cZ2POW



Supreme Court Denies Cert to Binno’s ABA Suit:
http://bit.ly/2Z36PFO



Jason Turkish’s Previous Lawsuit Over Bar Exam:
http://bit.ly/3q5FW06



Google’s Indefatigable Lawyer who Just Happens to Be Blind:
https://bit.ly/3jBZUNp



LSAC Current Volume Summary Report: http://bit.ly/2MGEbIo



33 Common LSAT Flaws: https://amzn.to/3efTuzY



Start Your BarMax Free Trial Now:
https://go.onelink.me/3011142272/d02ba2de



Start Your LSATMax Free Trial:
https://go.onelink.me/z1Zu/689fb4b4



The Road to 180: The Ultimate Guide to LSAT Prep (free on Kindle
unlimited): https://amzn.to/3q4ifp1