Startseite
Podcasts
re:publica 18 - Alle Sessions Podcast
Exploring standards for algorithmic transparency

Exploring standards for algorithmic transparency

re:publica 18 - Alle Sessions vor 8 Jahren

Algorithms make decisions affecting us in ways ranging from what we see on social media to how we are targeted by advertisers and law enforcement. Badly designed algorithms using biased or flawed datasets can violate people’s rights. Given such power, the

0:00

59:29

Andrea Hackl, Laura Reed, Djordje Krivokapic, Vladan Joler The
Ranking Digital Rights annual Corporate Accountability Index
currently evaluates 22 internet, mobile, and telecommunications
companies on their disclosed policies affecting users’ freedom of
expression and privacy. Given the urgent public interest concerns
related to algorithms, we want to explore how the Index can also
set standards for corporate disclosure and accountability around
the development and use of algorithms. In co-facilitating this
workshop, RDR will leverage its expertise in developing
indicators—which are broadly applicable standards that enable
researchers to measure and compare companies’ disclosed policies
affecting users’ digital rights—while SHARE Foundation will draw
upon its experience researching and mapping the influence of
Facebook’s algorithm. We will begin the workshop with a discussion
of what we mean by algorithmic transparency and what researchers
and civil society groups have suggested as best practices. We will
map out the different ways that such company practices and
disclosures could be evaluated and compared with one another, based
on our experience developing the Index methodology. Participants
will then be broken up into smaller groups to brainstorm key
considerations and potential elements for inclusion in an indicator
measuring algorithmic transparency that could be used by
researchers and civil society to determine whether companies are
developing and deploying algorithms in a responsible and
accountable manner. Discussion topics may include (but are not
limited to): What standards and good practices are we seeking to
encourage? How should transparency be defined in the context of
algorithms? What would meaningful transparency look like? What
obstacles prevent us from evaluating algorithmic transparency? What
is realistic to expect companies to disclose? RDR will use the
recommendations and feedback from workshop participants to explore
whether and how to incorporate evaluation of algorithmic
transparency into its Index.