Anmeldung Registrierung
Erweiterte Suche

In Part Two of our series on the Missing 411 phenomenon, we'll
first examine a study conducted to determine which National Parks
are the most dangerous in the United States.  The numbers
and causes may surprise you.  We then take a closer look at
a few more puzzling cases and, with a critical eye, examine the
data presented by David Paulides and the CanAm Project vs. what's
been reported by the news media.  Discrepancies raise
questions when ascertaining the objective facts and judging if
the evidence is remarkable.  There are plenty of errors and
omissions from all parties, but what are the causes and
intentions behind them?  With hundreds, perhaps thousands of
incidents, it's understandable when a news outlet rushing to
report under a deadline makes mistakes, but can the same leeway
be given to Paulides?  Are they honest mistakes or the handy
claim that details are "cherry-picked," overlooked, or
embellished to prop up a narrative and sell content?  Will
later discoveries change the investigations, are we being told
everything, and what are the motivations of those doing the
telling or omitting?  Are blunders in the reporting,
whatever the intent, proof that nothing extraordinary is going
on?  As we conclude the episode with an overall skeptical
analysis and finish with our personal assessments, it's clear
that what is deemed either a mundane tragedy or a mysterious
phenomenon is in the eye of the beholder.  As far as any
alarming pattern to these cases is concerned, if strange yet
commonplace coincidences do occur,
how many coincidences are too many?

Visit our website for a lot more information on this
episode. 

Teilen